On 12/31/13, 7:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 December 2013 04:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have
>>> (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn.
>>> How can I get these back? H
On 12/31/13, 10:43 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 31.12.2013 19:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 12/31/13, 7:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 31 December 2013 04:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have
>
Am 31.12.2013 19:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 12/31/13, 7:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 December 2013 04:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have
(sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions fro
In my experience, examples are most useful as ... well ... examples. As
such, they should be an example of how user code works. That means that
they should be a complete stand-alone project, just as most user programs
should be complete and standalone.
If you want to also deliver a pre-compiled
On 12/31/13, 7:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 December 2013 04:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have
>>> (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn.
>>> How can I get these back? H
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:37
>
> Did some cleanup in JIRA
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958
OGNL-238, unless I am misreading it, is asking for capabilities that do not
exist in Java since the infor
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:40
>
> 2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter :
> >> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the
> >> > >
> >> > > "package ognl;"
> >> > >
> >> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use
> >> > >
> >> > > "p
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 08:54:59 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable
files
from the Java sources lo
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable
>>> files
>>> from the Java sources located there?
>>> I guess th
On 31 December 2013 04:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have
>> (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn.
>> How can I get these back? How can I avoid this trauma each time I
>
On 31 December 2013 05:36, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons
> Pool 2.1.
Please remember to delete the old 2.0 version from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/commons/pool/
Thanks!
2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter :
>> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the
>> > >
>> > > "package ognl;"
>> > >
>> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use
>> > >
>> > > "package org.apache.commons.ognl;"
>> > >
>> > > I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package
>> > spa
Did some cleanup in JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958
2013/12/30 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron :
>> There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache
>> svn.
>> I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to s
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:10:17 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hey Gilles
2013/12/31 Gilles
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable
files
from the Java sources located
My own +1 FTR.
Benedikt
P.S.: Since I'll be celebrating new year's eve tonight, I'll count votes
tomorrow :-)
2013/12/28 Benedikt Ritter
> Hi all,
>
> I've fixed the issues, that were identified in RC1:
>
> - Release notes now make explicit that 3.2 at least requires Java 6.0
> - Website now
> -Original Message-
> From: Benedikt Ritter
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:05
>
> 2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: sebb
> > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17
> > >
> > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > > >> -Orig
Hey Gilles
2013/12/31 Gilles
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable
>>> files
>>> from the Java sources located there?
>>> I guess that a configurati
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:33:23 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/29/13, 6:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
Is there some framework in place in order to generate executable
files
from the Java sources located there?
I guess that a configuration snippet could be added in the
"pom.xml"[1]
so that one of th
2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sebb
> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17
> >
> > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Benedikt Ritter
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19
> > >>
> > >> Hello J
Thank you all guys, that would be my biggest gift for new year.
On 2013年12月29日, at 下午1:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I plan on taking a look over bel soon. The Clirr report hints at a package
> change. Thoughts?
>
> fary
>
>
> Original message
> From: Torsten Curdt
> Date:12/
20 matches
Mail list logo
