[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Pool 2.1 released

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons Pool 2.1. The Apache Commons Pool open source software library provides an object-pooling API and a number of object pool implementations. No client code changes are required to migrate from version 2.0 to 2.1. Users

Re: [help] [pool] restoring javadocs to site

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/30/13, 4:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have > (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn. > How can I get these back? How can I avoid this trauma each time I > try to publish the site? I guess I can just cp th

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: sebb > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Benedikt Ritter > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > >> > >> Hello Jason, > >> > >> sorry, I don't understand wh

Re: [help] restoring javadocs to site

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have >> (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn. >> How can I get these back? How can I avoid this trauma each ti

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > Good find with regard to Java 8. Do you feel like fixing trunk? Sorry, I have currently a very limited time frame for development - Jörg > > Gary > > Original message > From: Jörg Schaible > Date:12/30/2013 14:06 (GMT-05:00) > To: dev@commons.apache.

Re: [help] restoring javadocs to site

2013-12-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have > (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn. > How can I get these back? How can I avoid this trauma each time I > try to publish the site? I guess I can just cp the local mvn

Re: [help] restoring javadocs to site

2013-12-30 Thread Adrian Crum
I could never get that to work for Convert either. I just update the site manually by committing the local changes. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 12/30/2013 7:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have (sic) *dele

[help] restoring javadocs to site

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
I ran with scissors and tried mvn site-deploy and it seems to have (sic) *deleted* the previous javadoc versions from the site svn. How can I get these back? How can I avoid this trauma each time I try to publish the site? I guess I can just cp the local mvn site gen to a direct checkout the svn

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread sebb
On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 >> >> Hello Jason, >> >> sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can >> you give some examples? > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Checked artifact contents and build on OSX jdk 1.7. Also checked sigs and hashes. Key is available in KEYs and sigs are good. Nice work! Phil On 12/28/13, 9:57 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > I've fixed the issues, that were identified in RC1: > > - Release notes now make explic

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > > Hello Jason, > > sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can > you give some examples? The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the "package ognl;" declarations, where as the apache re

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Gary Gregory
Good find with regard to Java 8. Do you feel like fixing trunk? Gary Original message From: Jörg Schaible Date:12/30/2013 14:06 (GMT-05:00) To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2 Hi, my compiler zoo builds fine from source,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jörg, 2013/12/30 Jörg Schaible > Hi, > > my compiler zoo builds fine from source, except minor nits with Java 8: > > = %< == > Failed tests: > FastDateParserTest.testParseZone:119 expected: 2003> but was: > FastDateFormat_ParserTest>FastDate

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver, 2013/12/30 Oliver Heger > Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.6 and 1.7. Artifacts and > site look good. > > The only problem I found was that I could not successfully run the ant > build. ant test failed with compilation errors due to missing > dependencies to hamcrest -

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? Benedikt 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lukasz Lenart > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > > There are a lot of form

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi, my compiler zoo builds fine from source, except minor nits with Java 8: = %< == Failed tests: FastDateParserTest.testParseZone:119 expected: but was: FastDateFormat_ParserTest>FastDateParserTest.testParseZone:119 expected: but was: Tests in e

Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version > in git and apache svn. > > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to > subversion, > > do y

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.6 and 1.7. Artifacts and site look good. The only problem I found was that I could not successfully run the ant build. ant test failed with compilation errors due to missing dependencies to hamcrest - I guess the jar has to be added explicitly to the

RESULT: [VOTE] Release [pool] 2.1 based on RC2

2013-12-30 Thread Phil Steitz
This vote has passed, with +1 votes from Oliver Heger Phil Steitz Luc Maisonobe Mark Thomas Jörg Schaible and no other votes. Thanks to all who reviewed the RC. Phil On 12/26/13, 5:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to address > feed

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache > svn. > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to subversion, do you > know of any? All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version Regards -- Łukasz + 48 60

[VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1

2013-12-30 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons Exec 1.2-RC1 Feature and fix release. Requires a minimum of Java 1.3. The Apache Commons Exec team is pleased to announce the Apache commons-exec-1.2 release! Apache Commons Exec is a library to reliably execute external processes from within the JVM

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:33 > > I think OGNL-239 and OGNL-240 are the only real > (semi)blocking issues before we can start a new release. > Thankfully, they both have patches... There are a lot of formatting chenges between the v

Re: [compress] 2.0: require Java7?

2013-12-30 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi Stefan > > > 2013/12/30 Stefan Bodewig > > > Hi, > > > > I've started to write a tiny amount of code for 2.0 to get things moving > > (more on this later) and have already reached a point where Java7 may > > make a difference. > > > >

Re: [compress] 2.0: require Java7?

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Stefan 2013/12/30 Stefan Bodewig > Hi, > > I've started to write a tiny amount of code for 2.0 to get things moving > (more on this later) and have already reached a point where Java7 may > make a difference. > > I'm trying to define an API for attributes beyond the set offered by > ArchivEn

[compress] 2.0: require Java7?

2013-12-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've started to write a tiny amount of code for 2.0 to get things moving (more on this later) and have already reached a point where Java7 may make a difference. I'm trying to define an API for attributes beyond the set offered by ArchivEntry so far - many (AR, ARJ, CPIO, ZIP, TAR, DUMP) of o