I plan on taking a look over bel soon. The Clirr report hints at a package
change. Thoughts?
fary
Original message
From: Torsten Curdt
Date:12/28/2013 18:35 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Cc: Barry Zhong
Subject: Re: Expecting BCEL6.0 release for 3 months.
If there are people happy with the snapshot - maybe we should do the
release.
The release was but on hold ages ago because there was no testing feedback.
Not sure what the state is terms of open tickets.
cheers,
Torsten
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We do not have a rel
+1, build from source succeeds for all my JDKs (incl. Java 8)
Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to
> address feedback from RC1.
>
> Pool 2.1 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/
>
> Mave
I've fixed some nits in SVN but none should be blockers.
Gary
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1
>
> Looks good (aside from my usual misgivings about breaking BC without a
> package change).
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hi a
+1
Looks good (aside from my usual misgivings about breaking BC without a
package change).
Gary
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've fixed the issues, that were identified in RC1:
>
> - Release notes now make explicit that 3.2 at least requires Java 6.0
>
Lost in my discussion on BC is my gratitude for Phil's return to Commons
and my thanks for preparing an RC for a crucial component.
Thank you Phil!
Gary
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to
> address feedba
Hi All:
It's been three years since an [exec] release, so I'll probably roll one in
the next couple of days to pick up the bug fixes and one feature now in
trunk.
Hack on if there is anything you want in there.
Right now, it seems OK as is.
Gary
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@ap
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/28/13, 8:07 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/27/13, 2:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> I have to say that the 'fix' for the Clirr issue is underwhelming, it
> >> does
> >>
On 12/28/13, 10:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/12/2013 18:51, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 12/28/13, 2:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 27/12/2013 02:18, Phil Steitz a écrit :
I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to
address feedback from RC1.
Le 28/12/2013 18:51, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 12/28/13, 2:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 27/12/2013 02:18, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to
>>> address feedback from RC1.
>>>
>>> Pool 2.1 RC2 is available for review here:
>>> ht
On 12/28/13, 8:07 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 12/27/13, 2:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I have to say that the 'fix' for the Clirr issue is underwhelming, it
>> does
>>> not exist IMO.
>>>
>>> - The new API does not have a @since 2.1 in t
Hi all,
I've fixed the issues, that were identified in RC1:
- Release notes now make explicit that 3.2 at least requires Java 6.0
- Website now makes explicit that 3.2 at least requires Java 6.0
- MANIFEST now contains "britter" as value for the Build-By header
- Version 3.2 is now listed on the
On 12/28/13, 2:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 27/12/2013 02:18, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to
>> address feedback from RC1.
>>
>> Pool 2.1 RC2 is available for review here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/
On 12/28/13, 2:38 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Send from my mobile device
>
>> Am 28.12.2013 um 04:03 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>>
>>> On 12/27/13, 10:21 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>> Maven build was successful with Java 6 and 7 on Windows 7. Artifacts and
>>> site look good.
>>>
>>> So +1
>>>
>>> Mino
Hi.
I've just attached the proposed implementation:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-923
It is part of a new package "o.a.c.m.ml.neuralnet" that is supposed
to contain tools for creating artificial neural networks; however
the code has been written based on the single SOFM use case.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/27/13, 2:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I have to say that the 'fix' for the Clirr issue is underwhelming, it
> does
> > not exist IMO.
> >
> > - The new API does not have a @since 2.1 in the Javadoc.
>
> Should be fixed, but not a bloc
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/12/27 Gary Gregory
>
> > Sorry for the top post, $!# phone.
> >
> > Yes the solution proposed is Ok but this begs the question: Are we now
> > implying that all public types and methods are really part of the public
> > API? This sol
2013/12/27 Gary Gregory
> Sorry for the top post, $!# phone.
>
> Yes the solution proposed is Ok but this begs the question: Are we now
> implying that all public types and methods are really part of the public
> API? This solution also needs a statement to answer this question.
>
Sorry, you los
On 27/12/2013 01:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...
Send from my mobile device
> Am 28.12.2013 um 04:03 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>
>> On 12/27/13, 10:21 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Maven build was successful with Java 6 and 7 on Windows 7. Artifacts and
>> site look good.
>>
>> So +1
>>
>> Minor nit: The ant build did not work for me, obviously du
Le 27/12/2013 02:18, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> I have updated the release notes and MBean interface class javadoc to address
> feedback from RC1.
>
> Pool 2.1 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://reposi
21 matches
Mail list logo
