[compress] Tika test error with IMPLODEd zip

2013-12-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi even thouhg Gump stopped nagging, it still works. Tika is built by Gump and they have a test they call testUnsupportedZipCompressionMethod in which they seem to use an archive created with an IMPLODED entry. This test started to fail when Emmanuel added support for IMPLODE but unfortunately i

Commons Codec (archived) site - broken javadoc links

2013-12-21 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
BTW: I noticed that on the homepage there is a 1.9 link which leads to 404 page. I then used the 1.8 link (http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/archives/1.8/index.html) since I was looking for JavaDoc, and there is a "JavaDoc 1.7" link in the menu (but points to 1.8 url - but al

Re: [ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
+1 Emmanuel Le 21/12/2013 16:41, Oliver Heger a écrit : > Hi all, > > a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: > > The vote mail points to the staging repository containing all maven > artifacts including the distributions. When the release is done, the > repository has to be cleaned to re

Maven downloads [was [ALL] Votes and staging repositories]

2013-12-21 Thread sebb
On 21 December 2013 17:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 21 December 2013 16:25, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 21 December 2013 15:41, Oliver Heger >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> >

[exec] release 1.1.1?

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: A user a recently expressed a need for trunk to be pushed out as 1.1.1. Does any one have the desire to shepherd this through? Is there any pending work anyone would like to see go in for 1.1.1? Thank you, Garyt -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence

Re: [ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 December 2013 16:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 21 December 2013 15:41, Oliver Heger > >> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: > >> > > >> >

Re: [ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread sebb
On 21 December 2013 16:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 21 December 2013 15:41, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: >> > >> > The vote mail points to the staging repository containing all maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 8.1 with JDK 7 (I could not > test with Java 6 unfortunately). Artifacts and site look good. > > Following minor nits (not blocking): > Thank you for the review! > - Is the TODO file in the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
My +1. Gary On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1 > > Feature and fix release. Requires a minimum of Java 1.6. > > Changes in this version include: > > Performance: > CODEC-174: Improve performance of Beider Morse

Re: [ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, sebb wrote: > On 21 December 2013 15:41, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: > > > > The vote mail points to the staging repository containing all maven > > artifacts including the distributions. When the releas

Re: [ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread sebb
On 21 December 2013 15:41, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi all, > > a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: > > The vote mail points to the staging repository containing all maven > artifacts including the distributions. When the release is done, the > repository has to be cleaned to remove the file

[ALL] Votes and staging repositories

2013-12-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, a side note to the ongoing vote for [codec]: The vote mail points to the staging repository containing all maven artifacts including the distributions. When the release is done, the repository has to be cleaned to remove the files which should not go to Maven central. This is a manual and

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

2013-12-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 8.1 with JDK 7 (I could not test with Java 6 unfortunately). Artifacts and site look good. Following minor nits (not blocking): - Is the TODO file in the source distribution really needed? It is listed in the RAT report because it does not have a license.

Re: [compress] cutting 1.7?

2013-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
It looks like you got a lot of mileage out of this :) seems to me that you have enough for an RC that will not blow up. We'll done to all of us! :) Gary Original message From: Stefan Bodewig Date:12/20/2013 10:21 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [comp