Re: [all] simplifying releases: dist vs. maven repo

2013-12-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 15.12.2013 22:29, schrieb Phil Steitz: > On 12/14/13, 12:01 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: >> Am 14.12.2013 05:20, schrieb Phil Steitz: >>> On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>

Re: [compress] cutting 1.7?

2013-12-16 Thread Torsten Curdt
> Keep the release train moving... :) > +1 Amen to that :)

Re: [pool] 2.0.1 RC

2013-12-16 Thread Phil Steitz
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 3:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 14/12/2013 23:05, Phil Steitz wrote: >> I would like to cut an RC containing recent fixes for POOL-240, >> 243. Any objections? Review of the fix for POOL-243 and any other >> improvements to the code or docs much appreciated. > > It

RE: [compress] cutting 1.7?

2013-12-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Keep the release train moving... :)  Gary Original message From: Stefan Bodewig Date:12/16/2013 06:19 (GMT-05:00) To: dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [compress] cutting 1.7? Hi all, 1.6 has a regression inside the tar package that causes serious problems for people not

[compress] cutting 1.7?

2013-12-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, 1.6 has a regression inside the tar package that causes serious problems for people not using buffered streams when reading archives. Current trunk contains some new code that seems to have acceptable test coverage by now. I know Emmanuel is working on an IMPLODE implementation for the z

Re: [pool] 2.0.1 RC

2013-12-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/12/2013 23:05, Phil Steitz wrote: > I would like to cut an RC containing recent fixes for POOL-240, > 243. Any objections? Review of the fix for POOL-243 and any other > improvements to the code or docs much appreciated. It needs to be 2.1 not 2.0.1 as I have added a couple of new features