I propose [1] as branching model. It looks very complicated at first, but
I've found it very useful to always have a release ready version of the
code in master.
[1] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
2013/11/24 Benedikt Ritter
> Let's give it a try. No objections from my s
2013/11/25 Oliver Heger
> Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
> BEANUTILS-454 [1].
>
Sorry Oliver, I'm busy at the moment. I will not have time much time until
mid december. And then there is christmas... :-)
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.or
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
Hi Emmanuel
> I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
Thank you.
Firstly, we discussed several options before for the 1.0 release, and
agreed that the contents of trunk would be quickly pushed out as 1.0
with minimal cha
Thank you both, Gilles and Phil, for the warm welcome and for the detailed
suggestions.
It will take a little longer than I had anticipated to get this code up to
standard, but I will keep at it. Nothing ahead looks too onerous;
hopefully, soon it will be ready.
Thank you again for your time and
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
>
> GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
> the "TR" part of "CTR" done carefully ;). I have started working on
> the tests and fi
On 11/25/13, 3:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
GKOP still needs to be fixed to resolve this and the GOP fix needs
the "TR" part of "CTR" done carefully ;). I have started working on
the tests and fix for GKOP.
Phil
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
Are we getting a 2.0.1 for this fix?
Gary
Original message
From: "Phil Steitz (JIRA)"
Date:11/25/2013 18:12 (GMT-05:00)
To: iss...@commons.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (POOL-240) GKOP: invalidateObject does not
unblock threads waiting in borrowObject
[
I have no problem with copying null to null.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
> BEANUTILS-454 [1].
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454
>
> Am 10.11.2013 22:36, s
Any updates here? Also, I would like to hear what others think about
BEANUTILS-454 [1].
Thanks
Oliver
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-454
Am 10.11.2013 22:36, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Hello,
>
> I'm back from a conference week and I hope to find the time to have a look at
On 11/25/13, 6:36 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote:
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through
>> the Wish
>> List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the
>> special
>> functions request.
>
It might be interesting to have a version of the ASM impl that could be
available automatically in such an environment, yes.
Matt
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't
> do it. basically same applies for
Hi Bernd,
Thanks a lot for finding the problems in the site!
And, I hope you didn't lose too much time on the wiki page. :-)
I created a task to correct broken links and others in the site:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-176
I will try to fix it from time to time with the issue. Pl
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:46:46 -0500, Brian Wignall wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the
Wish
List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special
functions request.
Thanks for your interest in Commons Math.
Contribution
Hello, everyone.
I am new and hoping to make my first contribution. I read through the Wish
List, and I thought I could help quickly by starting with the special
functions request.
I created a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1066) that
contains a patch for Bessel functions of the
Your initial statement is right however I don't get why we shouldn't
do it. basically same applies for Unsafe which is used by all
frameworks. I don't say we should drop spi to use it, just we should
support it as a base when nothing is provided. IMO this would really
simplify the setup of [proxy]
Hi Damjan,
I reviewed the API, here are my observations:
- Would that make sense to move the LZM implementation to commons-compress?
- What is the purpose of CachingInputStream and CachingOutputStream,
there is no Javadoc on these classes. Could they be merged into commons-io?
- Why is ZLibUtil
On 25 November 2013 07:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Maybe too early and I'm pretty I'll not get time to work on it in the
> following months but saw yesterday jdk8 contains asm repackaged:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a40b0f51613b
>
> This could be great for [pro
17 matches
Mail list logo
