On 11/23/13, 11:31 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Are there any objections to changing the API sigs from foo(double[] values)
>>> to foo(double... values) ?
>> Yes. I am -0 for adding new methods that take varargs; -1 for
>> removing the double[] v
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Are there any objections to changing the API sigs from foo(double[] values)
>> to foo(double... values) ?
>
> Yes. I am -0 for adding new methods that take varargs; -1 for
> removing the double[] versions.
Phil note that foo(double... value
On 11/23/13, 10:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> When I use APIs like StatUtils.mean() I have to write:
>
> StatUtils.mean(new double[]{ var1, var2, var2});
>
> instead of:
>
> StatUtils.mean(var1, var2, var2);
>
> Are there any objections to changing the API sigs from foo(double[] values)
Hi All:
When I use APIs like StatUtils.mean() I have to write:
StatUtils.mean(new double[]{ var1, var2, var2});
instead of:
StatUtils.mean(var1, var2, var2);
Are there any objections to changing the API sigs from foo(double[] values)
to foo(double... values) ?
This would not be possible for A
Le 23/11/2013 16:40, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> In my old code, I use [cli]. In my new code I use JCommander (also under
> the Apache 2 license).
>
> [cli] really feels antiquated.
>
> I'd the community's thoughts on moving to a cli2 that uses annotations, or
> possibly asking JCommander to join u
I think it is ok to rename branches if it helps understand the code base. I do
not think we should delete anything though.
Gary
Original message
From: Phil Steitz
Date:11/23/2013 11:41 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [pool] branch cleanup
I just got c
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on
> RC5 and hope that people are still willing to review and vote for this RC.
>
> Changes since RC4:
>
> * [COLLECTIONS-502] Resolved generic parameter inconsistency for
> v
Jason submitted his patch [1], what should we do? apply or leave it?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-239
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/11/14 Christian Grobmeier :
> On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Chri
Thomas, I continue to be blown away by your tirelessness!
Matt
On Nov 23, 2013 7:07 AM, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Sat Nov 23 13:06:53 2013
> New Revision: 887799
>
> Log:
> Publish commons site with release versions for each proper component.
>
> Added:
> websites/production/commons/conten
I just got confused by the branch naming. Would anyone object to
dropping 1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH, 1_4_RELEASE_BRANCH, 2_0_DEV and
renaming 1_5_RELEASE to 1_5 and renaming POOL_1_X to 1_6? The first
two should not be used to base any work for subsequent 1.3 or 1.4
releases, 2.0 is now in trunk and the
On 23 November 2013 15:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> In my old code, I use [cli]. In my new code I use JCommander (also under
> the Apache 2 license).
>
> [cli] really feels antiquated.
+1
> I'd the community's thoughts on moving to a cli2 that uses annotations
There is also the Avalon
On 23 November 2013 15:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Maurizio:
>> ISTR that, at the example of Sebb, we tend to avoid implicit boxing and
>> unboxing in the various Commons codebases including that of [lang].
>>
>
> That's the style I've been
On 11/23/2013 04:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Am 23.11.2013 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>> For those of you with +1's: Did you test the SVN tag or the src zip? Did
>>> you see the same RAT issue I did?
>>> Thank you,
>>>
Hi All:
In my old code, I use [cli]. In my new code I use JCommander (also under
the Apache 2 license).
[cli] really feels antiquated.
I'd the community's thoughts on moving to a cli2 that uses annotations, or
possibly asking JCommander to join us here.
Gary
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com
+1
Tested building "mvn clean site" from src zip file with:
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
11:22:22-0400)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.1.1\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_45\jre
Def
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Maurizio:
> ISTR that, at the example of Sebb, we tend to avoid implicit boxing and
> unboxing in the various Commons codebases including that of [lang].
>
That's the style I've been using in Commons and at work.
The advantage of explicit b
Maurizio:
ISTR that, at the example of Sebb, we tend to avoid implicit boxing and
unboxing in the various Commons codebases including that of [lang].
Matt
On Nov 23, 2013 5:12 AM, wrote:
> Author: mcucchiara
> Date: Sat Nov 23 11:11:28 2013
> New Revision: 1544770
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Am 23.11.2013 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > For those of you with +1's: Did you test the SVN tag or the src zip? Did
> > you see the same RAT issue I did?
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
>
> yes, I saw two unknown licenses in the RAT
On 2013-11-21, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on
> RC5 and hope that people are still willing to review and vote for this RC.
+1
and thanks again
Stefan
-
To unsubs
Hi Gary,
Am 23.11.2013 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
> For those of you with +1's: Did you test the SVN tag or the src zip? Did
> you see the same RAT issue I did?
> Thank you,
> Gary
yes, I saw two unknown licenses in the RAT report. I was testing on
windows. Maybe this depends on the platform?
For those of you with +1's: Did you test the SVN tag or the src zip? Did
you see the same RAT issue I did?
Thank you,
Gary
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I've reviewed this RC with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 20
Hello Thomas,
I've reviewed this RC with:
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
17:22:22+0200)
Maven home: /Applications/dev/maven/apache-maven-3.1.1
Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.j
Thank you all!
Gary
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
> Congrats Gary!
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
>
> On 11/22/2013 9:19 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Apache board meeting was held
23 matches
Mail list logo
