Hi Bernd,
I think I can correct it and the other outdated information in the page.
Could you give me proper access to edit?
My wiki name is 'Woonsan Ko'.
Cheers,
Woonsan
On Friday, November 15, 2013 3:08 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
The "Stopwatch" usecase link on that wiki page is broken
The "Stopwatch" usecase link on that wiki page is broken. Can somebody
please remove the /sandbox/ part?
(And I would be happy if somebody tells me what can I do to get some more
permissions in the Wiki)
Gruss
Bernd
Am 15.11.2013, 20:58 Uhr, schrieb Woonsan Ko :
[1] http://wiki.apache.or
It seems to have been based on July 2005 W3C SCXML Working Draft. [1]
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheers,
Woonsan
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
On Friday, November 15, 2013 2:24 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi,
>
>While looking into Send action, I realize
Hi,
While looking into Send action, I realized that it doesn't differentiate yet
eventexpr from event, targetexpr from target, typeexpr from type and delayexpr
from delay.
It was probably still based on some older draft(s).
So, does anyone know which draft version(s) it was based on?
Also, I won
sebb wrote:
> Moving to dev list
>
> On 15 November 2013 11:52, Bruno P. Kinoshita
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, yesterday I noticed a couple of test issues in jira (it called my
>> attention because they were in pt-BR). I asked the user to stop but looks
>> like he created another one today. Is there a
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:09:07 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/13/13 8:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/13/13 7:52 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:25:22 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/13/13 2:31 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:44:13 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
The implementatio
Moving to dev list
On 15 November 2013 11:52, Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
>
>
> Hi, yesterday I noticed a couple of test issues in jira (it called my
> attention because they were in pt-BR). I asked the user to stop but looks
> like he created another one today. Is there a way to block a user or
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during the vote for collections 4.0 we have discovered a problem wrt the
> MultiMap interface in general and specifically the MultiKeyMap.
>
> Java 8 introduces a new default method in the Map interface:
>
> boolean remove(Object key, Object value)
