On 11/8/13 1:27 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/13 4:35 AM, Matt Adereth wrote:
>> While writing the test cases for KendallsCorrelation, I discovered an
>> interesting behavior with SpearmansCorrelation that might be considered an
>> inconsistency. SpearmansCorrelation.correlate() throws
>> MathI
On 11/8/13 8:30 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 09:12 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/07/2013 09:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 11/7/13 12:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 11/07/2013 06:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Thanks so much for starting to build these out, Thomas!
>>>
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > So the upshot is that dealing with this will cost at least a significant
> > integer degradation in performance at no benefit relative to the normal
> > user's expectations with regard to sparse vector operations. I say no
> > benefit becau
On 11/8/13 4:35 AM, Matt Adereth wrote:
> While writing the test cases for KendallsCorrelation, I discovered an
> interesting behavior with SpearmansCorrelation that might be considered an
> inconsistency. SpearmansCorrelation.correlate() throws
> MathIllegalArgumentException if the array length i
Hello,
Wohoo! 500 Bugs :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-500
just a small pointer: I created JIRA VFS-500 to track the inclusion of my
patch for VFSClassLoader#findResource(String) which was a not implemented
method. It also contains a Unit test which checks for the ability to lo
On 11/08/2013 09:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/13 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
is there still consensus that we are going to remove the sparse
implementations with 4.0?
>>> Well, I really think it is a pity, we should supp
On 11/8/13 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>>> is there still consensus that we are going to remove the sparse
>>> implementations with 4.0?
>> Well, I really think it is a pity, we should support this. But lets face
>> it: up to now we have b
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > is there still consensus that we are going to remove the sparse
> > implementations with 4.0?
>
> Well, I really think it is a pity, we should support this. But lets face
> it: up to now we have been unable to do it properly. Sébastien who
Le 08/11/2013 18:38, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> On 10/13/2013 09:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Commons math decided not to support sparse matrices due to the difficulty
>> of getting them just right.
>>
>> The problem is that 0 * Inf = NaN, not 0. This means that for floating
>> point math, 0 * x
On 10/13/2013 09:41 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Commons math decided not to support sparse matrices due to the difficulty
> of getting them just right.
>
> The problem is that 0 * Inf = NaN, not 0. This means that for floating
> point math, 0 * x = x is not a true identity.
>
> The problem really a
On 11/07/2013 09:12 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 09:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/7/13 12:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 11/07/2013 06:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks so much for starting to build these out, Thomas!
Patches welcome for more sample code :)
>>
Le 08/11/2013 16:45, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> thanks for your review, although I had hoped for something like this
> after the 4.0-alpha release. Nevertheless, see my comments inline:
Sorry for this late review, I intended to do it for the alpha release
but did get the time.
> The release no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 02:49 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I reviewed the site, the Javadoc and the test coverage. Here are
> my comments:
Hi Emmanuel,
thanks for your review, although I had hoped for something like this
after the 4.0-alpha release. Nevertheles
I reviewed the site, the Javadoc and the test coverage. Here are my
comments:
* The release notes [1] states:
"This release is not source or binary compatible with v3.x."
I think this might be somewhat confusing, as one could believe the
version 4 conflicts with the version 3.x when they can act
+1: oheger, luc, tn, psteitz, markt
+0: ggregory
All votes are binding unless otherwise noted.
The vote therefore passes.
I'll start the work to complete the release process shortly.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 07:35:01 -0500, Matt Adereth wrote:
While writing the test cases for KendallsCorrelation, I discovered an
interesting behavior with SpearmansCorrelation that might be
considered an
inconsistency. SpearmansCorrelation.correlate() throws
MathIllegalArgumentException if the arr
While writing the test cases for KendallsCorrelation, I discovered an
interesting behavior with SpearmansCorrelation that might be considered an
inconsistency. SpearmansCorrelation.correlate() throws
MathIllegalArgumentException if the array length is less than 2, but
returns Double.NaN if the arr
On 7 November 2013 17:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron :
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Benedikt Ritter
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
>>>
>>> Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
>>
>> Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it...
>>
>> Is Log4j2 the one
On 7 November 2013 17:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/6/13 10:11 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> I find it unhelpful and confusing at times to see Commons sites for
>>> -SNAPSHOT version.
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to be able to browse
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0 based on RC2.
Changes since RC1:
* release notes are now also included in the binary distribution
* removed spurious hashCode() method in AbstractPatriciaTrie, the
inherited one from AbstractMap will be used instead
C
On 2013-11-08, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've opened INFRA-6978.
which has just been resolved.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
21 matches
Mail list logo
