How many of these actually matter any more?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> In Math, is there any appetite for large patches containing many
> instances of particular micro-optimizations? Examples:
>
> - Replace:
> a[i][j] = a[i][j] + foo;
> with:
> a[i][j] += foo;
On 10/31/2013 04:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Development on Pool 2 is complete and a review of the remaining DBCP
> bugs has not highlighted any that are likely to trigger significant API
> changes in Pool so it is time for a release.
>
> The Pool 2.0 RC2 is available for review here:
> https:/
On 11/01/2013 12:57 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Please vote on releasing commons-imaging 1.0 from RC5.
>
> RC4 and its problems and their fixes were in this thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCAJm2B-nbnbJwNUKkAtapZuzT5jfFODsk1aXcdsUUeoC%2BxXrDKg%40mail.
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/1/13 5:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/11/2013 12:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>> Hello Mark,
>>>
>>> again building with:
>> Thanks again for the testing.
>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
>>> 17:22:22+0200)
>>> Maven home
Hi Damjan,
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Please vote on releasing commons-imaging 1.0 from RC5.
>
> RC4 and its problems and their fixes were in this thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCAJm2B-nbnbJwNUKkAtapZuzT5jfFODsk1aXcdsUUeoC%2BxXrDKg%40mail.gmail.com%3
On 11/1/13 5:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 12:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hello Mark,
>>
>> again building with:
> Thanks again for the testing.
>
>> Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
>> 17:22:22+0200)
>> Maven home: /Applications/dev/maven/apach
Hi Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Development on Pool 2 is complete and a review of the remaining DBCP
> bugs has not highlighted any that are likely to trigger significant API
> changes in Pool so it is time for a release.
>
> The Pool 2.0 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.
Hi all,
I have further reworked the skin available at
https://github.com/netomi/commons-skin-fluido and the results can be
seen here:
http://people.apache.org/~tn/commons/fluido/commons/
http://people.apache.org/~tn/commons/fluido/codec/
http://people.apache.org/~tn/commons/fluido/lang3/
The ski
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> If the improvements make a material difference [1], by all means
> open tickets and submit patches. If they are just cosmetic, my
> personal opinion is this should be done in small commits
> incrementally if at all [2]. It is OK to open master
On 11/2/13 8:19 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> There are tens of possible types of changes here, each affecting tens
> or even 100+ files. I wondered if it would be irritating to open,
> potentially, tens of JIRAs.
>
> Maybe I can start with a JIRA or two, each addressing one or a few
> closely-related cha
There are tens of possible types of changes here, each affecting tens
or even 100+ files. I wondered if it would be irritating to open,
potentially, tens of JIRAs.
Maybe I can start with a JIRA or two, each addressing one or a few
closely-related changes. If it's going well, I can propose more unt
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:52:34 +, Sean Owen wrote:
In Math, is there any appetite for large patches containing many
instances of particular micro-optimizations? Examples:
- Replace:
a[i][j] = a[i][j] + foo;
with:
a[i][j] += foo;
… which is faster/leaner in the byte code by a little
In Math, is there any appetite for large patches containing many
instances of particular micro-optimizations? Examples:
- Replace:
a[i][j] = a[i][j] + foo;
with:
a[i][j] += foo;
… which is faster/leaner in the byte code by a little bit. It might
make a difference in many nested, tight
On 11/02/2013 11:04 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 November 2013 08:44, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/02/2013 09:29 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>>
On 2 November 2013 08:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I can remember that a while ago there was the suggestion to include the
latest release vers
On 2 November 2013 08:44, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 09:29 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can remember that a while ago the
On 11/02/2013 09:29 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I can remember that a while ago there was the suggestion to include the
latest release version
On 11/02/2013 03:11 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> Hi Thomas!
>
>> The result can be seen here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~tn/commons/site/
>>
>> The updated project can be found here:
>>
>> https://github.com/netomi/commons-site
>
>
> I liked it! +1 :o)
>
> I think being able to se
On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I can remember that a while ago there was the suggestion to include the
>>> latest release version + release date for each commons component on the
>>> m
19 matches
Mail list logo
