Re: [WIKI] Request to be added to the wiki Contributors Group

done On 31 October 2013 22:54, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 10/14/2013 08:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote: >> Can someone add my wiki name (AteDouma) to the Contributors Group page [1]? >> >> Thanks, Ate >> >> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup > > Could somebody please add me to some gr

[Commons Wiki] Update of "ContributorsGroup" by sebbapache

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "ContributorsGroup" page has been changed by sebbapache: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8 * PhilSteitz * SebastienBrisard * Simo

Re: [math] *nudge* Patch for MATH-814: Kendalls Tau Implementation

On 10/30/2013 12:37 AM, Matt Adereth wrote: > I'm not impatient, just following the instructions from the developer guide > which says to nudge if a patch goes unnoticed for a few days... > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-814 Hi Matt, thanks for the patch and nudge. Your patch is co

Re: [WIKI] Request to be added to the wiki Contributors Group

On 10/14/2013 08:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Can someone add my wiki name (AteDouma) to the Contributors Group page [1]? > > Thanks, Ate > > [1] https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup Could somebody please add me to some group so that I can change some pages on the wiki? My wiki name is

commons-lang pull request: added the new JsonToStringStyle

GitHub user anilbharadia opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/12 added the new JsonToStringStyle a simple ToStringStyle which outputs the String representation of the object in json format. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runn

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:35:50 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 10/31/2013 05:18 PM, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: Hello. Are th

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On 10/31/2013 05:18 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote: >> On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles wrote: >>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: > > Hello. > > Are there criteria about filling

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: Hello. Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue record in the "changes.xml" file?

Re: svn commit: r1537525 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/BasicDataSource.java

On 31 October 2013 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/10/2013 15:36, sebb wrote: >> On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013 New Revision: 1537525 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r15

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:30:16 -0400, Ted Dunning wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gilles wrote: The person who raised the bug still took the trouble to do so. My question is still: is it sufficient? Without filing a bug report, the reporter is harming himself. Also, some reports a

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote: >> >> On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue >>> record in the "changes.xml" file? >>> >>> Current practice seems t

Re: svn commit: r1537525 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/BasicDataSource.java

On 31/10/2013 15:36, sebb wrote: > On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: sebb >>> Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013 >>> New Revision: 1537525 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525 >>> Log: >>> Document that CCE is handled OK; the

Re: svn commit: r1537525 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/BasicDataSource.java

On 31 October 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: sebb >> Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013 >> New Revision: 1537525 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525 >> Log: >> Document that CCE is handled OK; there is no "unchecked" warning happening >>

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gilles wrote: > >> The person who raised the bug still took the trouble to do so. >> > > My question is still: is it sufficient? > Without filing a bug report, the reporter is harming himself. > > Also, some reports are only feature requests. I deem it quite unfai

Re: svn commit: r1537525 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/BasicDataSource.java

On 31/10/2013 15:13, s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Thu Oct 31 15:13:47 2013 > New Revision: 1537525 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537525 > Log: > Document that CCE is handled OK; there is no "unchecked" warning happening > here Why did you make this change? It undoes a recent

Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?

Sure, go ahead. :) Matt On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Makes sense for me t dro serialization support for 1.0. If users really > demand it, it can be added afterwards. > > Benedikt > > 2013/10/31 Bruno P. Kinoshita > > > Hi all, > > > > I posted it in the mailing l

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC2 as 2.0

Development on Pool 2 is complete and a review of the remaining DBCP bugs has not highlighted any that are likely to trigger significant API changes in Pool so it is time for a release. The Pool 2.0 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r3386)

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31 October 2013 14:36, sebb wrote: > On 31 October 2013 13:44, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 31/10/2013 12:59, sebb wrote: >>> On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: sebb >> Date:

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31 October 2013 13:44, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/10/2013 12:59, sebb wrote: >> On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb wrote: >>> On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas wrote: On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013 > New Revision: 1

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote: On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: Hello. Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue record in the "changes.xml" file? Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself warrants such an attribution.

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

A few issues have been found and fixed with RC1 so I am cancelling this vote. I'll start the process for RC2 shortly. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@com

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31/10/2013 12:59, sebb wrote: > On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb wrote: >> On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013 New Revision: 1537461 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461 >

Re: [Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > > Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue > record in the "changes.xml" file? > > Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself > warrants such an attribution. > Indeed, as I understand it, the attri

[Math] "due-to" attribute in "changes.xml"

Hello. Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue record in the "changes.xml" file? Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself warrants such an attribution. Indeed, as I understand it, the attribute is a place-holder for when an issue is fixed by a

Re: Please? WAS: Re: [JCS] Asking for advice: separate CacheAccess and GroupCacheAccess?

Hi Benedikt, On 28.10.13 12:53, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Trunk already contains 2.0-SNAPSHOT so it looks like someone intended to > roll out a new major release. Yep, that was me. And yes, this is my intention. The said issue must be fixed first, however. And I'm planning to add some JMX monitori

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31 October 2013 12:51, sebb wrote: > On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: sebb >>> Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013 >>> New Revision: 1537461 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461 >>> Log: >>> Apache branding >> >> Any more

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31 October 2013 12:20, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: sebb >> Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013 >> New Revision: 1537461 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461 >> Log: >> Apache branding > > Any more changes for Pool in the pipeline or is it safe for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

On 31 October 2013 12:05, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 30/10/2013 21:36, sebb wrote: >> On 30 October 2013 19:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 30/10/2013 17:52, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> >>> Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from no

Re: svn commit: r1537461 - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/xdoc: issue-tracking.xml mail-lists.xml

On 31/10/2013 12:10, s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:34 2013 > New Revision: 1537461 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1537461 > Log: > Apache branding Any more changes for Pool in the pipeline or is it safe for me to go ahead and roll Pool 2.0 RC2? Mark --

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VFS" by AxelSchwolow

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VFS" page has been changed by AxelSchwolow: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VFS?action=diff&rev1=16&rev2=17 * [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/loopy/|Loopy]] - Loopy is ISO96

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

On 30/10/2013 21:36, sebb wrote: > On 30 October 2013 19:31, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 30/10/2013 17:52, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> >> >>> Please review the release candidate and vote. >>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >>> [ ] +0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.0 RC1 as 2.0

On 30/10/2013 19:52, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > On my machine the tests take forever to run, about 5 minutes for mvn test. > I guess this is normal? (haven't looked into the tests in detail) Yes, that is normal. A number of the tests check various timeouts (eviction, abandoned objects etc.) so they

Re: Add to Contributors Group

Done On 31 October 2013 08:03, Axel Schwolow wrote: > > Hello, > > please add me (user AxelSchwolow) to the Contributors Group > so that I can > edit the Commons Wiki pages. Thanks! >

Add to Contributors Group

Hello, please add me (user AxelSchwolow) to the Contributors Group so that I can edit the Commons Wiki pages. Thanks!

[Commons Wiki] Update of "ContributorsGroup" by sebbapache

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "ContributorsGroup" page has been changed by sebbapache: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup?action=diff&rev1=6&rev2=7 * AdminGroup * ArchanaAcharya * AteDou