Thinking out loud - Here are the JIRA issues I think we should focus on:
What's left in 3.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+LANG+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.2%22+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved
The list of issues with patches that need reviewing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira
This makes it somewhat harder to read the docs code which is where I read docs
90+% of the time.
On the other hand my IDE will do the right thing if I ask it to.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 20, 2013, at 14:27, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 11:24 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author
On 2013-10-16, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Now that we have a new cleaned up RC, I want to make sure that we
> understand that, strictly speaking and while unlikely in practice,
> 1.6-RC2 breaks binary compatibility with 1.5 (see Clirr). I think we
> started discussing this and after some hand-waving so
On 2013-10-15, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
+1
[making my own vote explicit]
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 20 October 2013 15:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> I agree. If we don't deprecate it now, and agree to release the next major
> version targeting Java 7, we would remove those methods without ever
> mentioning it before.
That's not how I see it working.
I think the deprecations should be added o
On 10/20/13 2:27 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 11:24 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Sun Oct 20 21:24:45 2013
>> New Revision: 1533990
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533990
>> Log:
>> [MATH-1039] Avoid code duplication by calling logDensity itself.
>>
>> Modified:
On 10/20/2013 11:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:15:18 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> I no
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:15:18 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal pr
On 10/20/2013 11:24 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Sun Oct 20 21:24:45 2013
> New Revision: 1533990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533990
> Log:
> [MATH-1039] Avoid code duplication by calling logDensity itself.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org
On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>
>> [...]
>
> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an upp
On 10/20/13 12:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>
>> [...]
>
> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an upper
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference.
+1
Checked out tag and build with "mvn site" with:
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
08:51:28-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_40\jre
Default loc
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
>>> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
>>> there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference. I
>>> think that is important to h
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference. I
think that is important to have rules (yes, even trivial ones)
so that people (both commit
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.2 based on RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- fixed unit test SimpleHtmlEmail.testDefaultMimeCharset which
failed in certain environments
Email 1.3.2 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/em
On 10/20/13 4:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:22:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I inadvertently committed some WIP on Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
>> implementation (MATH-437) in r1533853, in which I meant only to fix
>> some javadoc in BinomialConfidenceInterval. The commit copi
On 10/20/13 7:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/10/2013 15:10, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Oct 20 14:10:43 2013
>> New Revision: 3300
>>
>> Log:
>> 8.0.0-RC5 release vote passed.
> Whoops. Should have committed this separately. Sorry.
>
> (I don't plan on reverting it or a
On 10/20/13 4:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:22:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I inadvertently committed some WIP on Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
>> implementation (MATH-437) in r1533853, in which I meant only to fix
>> some javadoc in BinomialConfidenceInterval. The commit copi
On 10/20/13 7:59 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> With Tortoise SVN it's easy. Right-click on your local copy,
> select Tortoise SVN -> Show Log. Right-click on your commit,
> select Revert changes from this revision. Commit.
>
Yeah, I can fairly easily just revert. But then I have to redo svn
copy and re
With Tortoise SVN it's easy. Right-click on your local copy, select
Tortoise SVN -> Show Log. Right-click on your commit, select Revert
changes from this revision. Commit.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 10/19/2013 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
I inadvertently comm
I agree. If we don't deprecate it now, and agree to release the next major
version targeting Java 7, we would remove those methods without ever
mentioning it before.
Thanks for adding the suppressions, btw :-)
Benedikt
2013/10/19 Henri Yandell
> My tuppence:
>
> Lang 3 targets Java 6, but use
woops, thanks for spotting this :-)
2013/10/18
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri Oct 18 16:03:17 2013
> New Revision: 1533527
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533527
> Log:
> Spelling
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/ObjectUtils.java
>
> Modified:
> co
Hi.
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:22:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I inadvertently committed some WIP on Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
implementation (MATH-437) in r1533853, in which I meant only to fix
some javadoc in BinomialConfidenceInterval. The commit copies the
existing implementation from the distrib
Hi Henning,
Am 20.10.2013 09:11, schrieb Henning Schmiedehausen:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that config is now working patiently towards a 2.0 release (thanks
> Oliver for all the work here!). The current trunk is no longer a drop-in
> replacement for code using 1.x (there are method signature changes in
Le 20/10/2013 09:11, Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit :
> I was thinking about creating a maintenance branch for 1.x, apply this
> patch and create an 1.10 release candidate. Wow, haven't done that in a
> while. Anyone objecting to that plan (and can point me at docs on how
> releases are done these
Hi,
it seems that config is now working patiently towards a 2.0 release (thanks
Oliver for all the work here!). The current trunk is no longer a drop-in
replacement for code using 1.x (there are method signature changes in
CompositeConfiguration and also bigger changes in the AbstractConfiguration
27 matches
Mail list logo
