Re: [csv] should CSVRecord's values() method be public?

2013-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/09/2013 21:05, Michele Rossi a écrit : > If "values()" was public I could use the data read from one CSV to directly > feed another CSV. Hi Michele, Thank you very much for the feedback. Would a printRecord(CSVRecord) method in CSVPrinter help solving your issue? Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [csv] should CSVRecord's values() method be public?

2013-09-15 Thread Adrian Crum
I needed access to that method too, so I made that method public in my local copy. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 9/15/2013 12:05 PM, Michele Rossi wrote: hi, I am trying to use commons-csv for a simple CSV transformation tool and I have encountered a couple of is

Re: [proxy2] stub module?

2013-09-15 Thread James Carman
Agreed, +1. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > Now that the stub module does not define a ProxyFactory implementation, it > seems it might be more appropriate to include the stub package in the core > module. Any objections? > > Matt --

Re: [SITE] Updating to fluido

2013-09-15 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 14.09.2013 um 14:26 schrieb sebb : > On 14 September 2013 13:17, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> a while back I started to work on commons appearance in public. Since then >> I've created a twitter account, requested git mirrors for all proper >> components and updated all Oloh prof

[csv] should CSVRecord's values() method be public?

2013-09-15 Thread Michele Rossi
hi, I am trying to use commons-csv for a simple CSV transformation tool and I have encountered a couple of issues that I would like to discuss. The CSVPrinter takes object arrays as input but the "values" method of CSVRecord is not public. In the code I am writing I check a condition to determine

[proxy2] stub module?

2013-09-15 Thread Matt Benson
Now that the stub module does not define a ProxyFactory implementation, it seems it might be more appropriate to include the stub package in the core module. Any objections? Matt

Re: [VFS] Re: [SITE] Updating to fluido

2013-09-15 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, Yes looks good– I was actually looking in that Place but I must have missed it, Good Job. Am 14.09.2013 um 19:02 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > Have a look at https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs > Should be up-to-date. Can you confirm that? > > Benedikt > > Send from my mobile device >