I agree that the choice of quadrature rules is orthogonal to Adaptive
strategy. But, can one quadrature rule be more efficient than another by
points evaluated per digit of accuracy?
It seems like in GKQ, the G and K nodes are different points at each level
of resolution. However in CCQ, the high
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:39:00 -0700, Ajo Fod wrote:
I wonder if Clenshaw-Curtis Quadrature (CCQ) is more adapted for
Adaptive
Quadrature than Gauss-Kronrod (GKQ).
As Konstantin already pointed out, the choice of a quadrature rule
is orthogonal to the choice of an adaptive strategy.
It seems l
I wonder if Clenshaw-Curtis Quadrature (CCQ) is more adapted for Adaptive
Quadrature than Gauss-Kronrod (GKQ). It seems like with CCQ the points at
one level of resolution can be reused for the next level. The error bounds
for a given level of resolution is the comparable to GKQ, so I'm guessing
t
