On 13 June 2013 21:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/13/13 1:03 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A piece of code I write far too often is:
>>
>> ==
>> public static byte[] getRandomBytes(int length) {
>> // validate length is non-negative
>>
>> byte[] result = new byte[length];
>> RANDOM.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=27125&projectId=69
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 13 Jun 2013 21:20:01 +
Finished at: Thu 13 Jun 2013 21:20:43 +
Total time: 41s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
On 6/13/13 1:03 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A piece of code I write far too often is:
>
> ==
> public static byte[] getRandomBytes(int length) {
> // validate length is non-negative
>
> byte[] result = new byte[length];
> RANDOM.nextBytes(result);
> return result;
> }
> ==
>
>
I'm still not really satisfied, since the only thing thats different between
XmlConfigParserTestCase and XmlConfigParser2TestCase is the config location…
I'm thinking about using a parameterized test. This will work as long the two
config define exactly the same catalogs.
WDYT?
Benedikt
Am 13
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "ReleaseDeployment" page has been changed by sebbapache:
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ReleaseDeployment?action=diff&rev1=6&rev2=7
These are deployed to the Nexus staging ar
Hi,
A piece of code I write far too often is:
==
public static byte[] getRandomBytes(int length) {
// validate length is non-negative
byte[] result = new byte[length];
RANDOM.nextBytes(result);
return result;
}
==
Is there a place for something like this in Commons Lang? Or, bet
On 2013-06-12, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
> don't know if this was already mentioned but providing strong
> encryption causes administrative head-ache
Actually, it doesn't. All that has to be done, is editing a page in the
CMS, adding a notice to the README and sending a single email.