On 5/22/13 5:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 01:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 May 2013 17:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
[parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning
>>> from
the folks over
On 5/22/13 9:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> [parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning from
> the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fast compared to
> Cobertura. In the case of [math] it's hours vs. minutes.
>
> The problem is that Jacoco produces
On 5/22/13 1:19 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed May 22 20:19:00 2013
> New Revision: 1485398
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1485398
> Log:
> Remove rule that assumed DBCP 1.4 is on Java 1.4, it is on Java 6.
-1 to this and the other 1.4-breaking changes in the 1.4 co
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 21:19, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Wed May 22 20:19:00 2013
> > New Revision: 1485398
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1485398
> > Log:
> > Remove rule that assumed DBCP 1.4 is on Java 1.4, it is on Java 6.
> >
>
> I'm n
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 22:08, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Wed May 22 21:08:22 2013
> > New Revision: 1485424
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1485424
> > Log:
> > Update Checkstyle plugin to a newer version, but not so new as to
> require rewr
On 22 May 2013 21:19, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed May 22 20:19:00 2013
> New Revision: 1485398
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1485398
> Log:
> Remove rule that assumed DBCP 1.4 is on Java 1.4, it is on Java 6.
>
I'm not sure that's correct.
Although the code is designed for JDBC 4 (Ja
On 22 May 2013 22:08, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed May 22 21:08:22 2013
> New Revision: 1485424
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1485424
> Log:
> Update Checkstyle plugin to a newer version, but not so new as to require
> rewriting checkstyle.xml.
Would be helpful to document this in th
On 23 May 2013 01:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2013 17:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > [parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning
>> from
>> > the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fa
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 17:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > [parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning
> from
> > the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fast compared to
> > Cobertura. In the case of [math]
On 22 May 2013 17:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> [parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning from
> the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fast compared to
> Cobertura. In the case of [math] it's hours vs. minutes.
>
> The problem is that Jacoco produc
Am 22.05.2013 18:22, schrieb Gary Gregory:
When I build [pool] trunk with 'mvn clean site', I get:
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total tim
Github user Olloth closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/05/2013 18:52, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> > The problem is that Jacoco produces bogus results as I recently emailed
> > about the [io] component. The large portion of the code is reported with
> 0%
> > coverage which is completely wr
Le 22/05/2013 18:52, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> The problem is that Jacoco produces bogus results as I recently emailed
> about the [io] component. The large portion of the code is reported with 0%
> coverage which is completely wrong. This is apparently a known issue due to
> the Jacoco use of 'pro
Hi All:
[parent] version 29 replaces Cobertura with Jacoco, the main reasoning from
the folks over at [math] being that Jacoco is very fast compared to
Cobertura. In the case of [math] it's hours vs. minutes.
The problem is that Jacoco produces bogus results as I recently emailed
about the [io] c
When I build [pool] trunk with 'mvn clean site', I get:
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 3:48.965s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed May 22 1
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:36 AM, sebb wrote:
> The private debug method requires an array of Objects to be passed to
> System.out.format.
>
> Any primitive parameters will be autoboxed.
>
> However, the boxing will be performed regardless of whether DEBUG is
> true or not.
> This is a bit wasteful
17 matches
Mail list logo
