RE: [VOTE] Release of Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC2

2013-05-17 Thread Roger L. Whitcomb
FWIW, I did some testing of the binaries with an existing application using Commons VFS and Apache Pivot and all appears to be good. +1 ~Roger Whitcomb Apache Pivot PMC Chair -Original Message- From: Thomas Neidhart [mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:28

Re: [ALL] maven-scm-publish-plugin and javadocs**

2013-05-17 Thread sebb
On 17 May 2013 18:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:26 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 17 May 2013 18:22, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Hi All: >> > >> > I see in several components: >> > >> > >> > org.apache.maven.plugins >> > maven-scm-publish-plugin >> >

Re: [ALL] maven-scm-publish-plugin and javadocs**

2013-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:26 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17 May 2013 18:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > I see in several components: > > > > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > > maven-scm-publish-plugin > > > > > > javadocs** >

Re: [ALL] maven-scm-publish-plugin and javadocs**

2013-05-17 Thread sebb
On 17 May 2013 18:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I see in several components: > > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-scm-publish-plugin > > > javadocs** > > > > > Should that be in the parent

[ALL] maven-scm-publish-plugin and javadocs**

2013-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: I see in several components: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-scm-publish-plugin javadocs** Should that be in the parent? If so, can you then ADD ignorePathsToDelete, like Commons Logging n

Re: [pool] 1.x and TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders

2013-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
Yep, it's a resource problem. I found a simple way to fix it. see revision 1483916. Thank you for digging in. Gary On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita < brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR: > looks like there is an ignored exception that occurs when the test

Re: [pool] 1.x and TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders

2013-05-17 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hello,  TL;DR: looks like there is an ignored exception that occurs when the test factory CustomClassLoaderObjectFactory tries to load a not existing resource. Test files 'test1' and 'test2' that are not processed by Maven (branch 1.x has a not-maven-default directory structure). This way, no

Re: [IO] converting streams to buffered versions - rename asBufferedxxxx to buffer?`

2013-05-17 Thread sebb
On 16 May 2013 18:25, Dave Brosius wrote: > or ByteArrayInput/OutputStream Would adding buffering help for those? If so. please raise a JIRA enhancement. > > On 05/16/2013 01:13 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >>> The issue >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-330 >>> >>> a

Re: [IO] converting streams to buffered versions - rename asBufferedxxxx to buffer?`

2013-05-17 Thread sebb
On 16 May 2013 18:25, Dave Brosius wrote: > or ByteArrayInput/OutputStream > > > On 05/16/2013 01:13 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >>> The issue >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-330 >>> >>> added 4 methods: >>> public static Buffered asBuffered(final )

Re: [pool] 1.x and TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders

2013-05-17 Thread Mark Thomas
On 17/05/2013 13:51, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 16/05/2013 20:58, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders (1) >>> org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders >>> >> testContextClassLoader(org.apache.common

Re: [pool] 1.x and TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders

2013-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/05/2013 20:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > > TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders (1) > > org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders > > > testContextClassLoader(org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericObjectPoolClassLoaders)

Re: [Graph] On activity of Sandbox Graph

2013-05-17 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rodde, thanks a lot for contributing to commons-graph, muh more than appreciated! See replies inline: > (a) What is the average duration between sending a patch P and getting it > reviewed by a committer, assuming P will draw some attention eventually? generally speaking, there is no such ave