I believe the point to this one is that any Closure that accepts a
supertype of T can accept a T argument, so it should be safe to "pretend"
that the Closure is actually parameterized to accept a T argument.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 22:15, Thomas Nei
On 30 April 2013 22:15, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 11:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>> I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
> >>>
> >>> There are no current warni
On 04/30/2013 11:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
>>>
>>> There are no current warnings in the main code.
>>>
>>> However, I've just discovered that
On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> > I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
> >
> > There are no current warnings in the main code.
> >
> > However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
>
On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
>
> There are no current warnings in the main code.
>
> However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
> suppressed, regardless of whether that is justified or not
I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
There are no current warnings in the main code.
However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
suppressed, regardless of whether that is justified or not.
I think this needs to be fixed before a relea
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/13 10:29 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
> wrote:
Am 30.04.2013 17:17, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 4/30/13 7:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
"developer"
categor
On 30 April 2013 19:25, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 08:07 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30 April 2013 19:03, wrote:
> >
> >> Author: tn
> >> Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
> >> New Revision: 1477744
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
> >> Log:
> >> Add trailing whitespace checksty
On 30 April 2013 19:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/13 10:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
> >>> to algorithms API
On 04/30/2013 08:07 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 19:03, wrote:
>
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
>> New Revision: 1477744
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
>> Log:
>> Add trailing whitespace checkstyle rule.
>>
>>
> That's daring!
>
> I've only done the test files s
On 4/30/13 10:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
>>> to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
>>> o
On 4/30/13 10:29 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
wrote:
>> Is there any policy concern
On 30 April 2013 19:03, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Tue Apr 30 18:03:28 2013
> New Revision: 1477744
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477744
> Log:
> Add trailing whitespace checkstyle rule.
>
>
That's daring!
I've only done the test files so far ...
> Modified:
> commons/proper/collection
On 30 April 2013 18:25, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> >>> On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
> >> wrote:
> Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alph
On 30 April 2013 17:28, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
> > to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
> > one example among others (solvers, int
On 4/30/13 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
>> wrote:
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repositor
On 30 April 2013 17:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
> >> releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
> >> replicated to
Le 30/04/2013 18:42, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
> bump, as Emmanuel seems to be active again ;-)
Uh oh, got caught :)
I'll get a look at the latest changes.
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 4/30/13 9:28 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles wrote:
>
>> Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
>> releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
>> replicated to Maven Central?
>>
>>
> Not sure that question makes sense a
On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together
> with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released
> soon:
>
> * there are no open major issues (most issues are related to cli2)
> * no findb
On 30 April 2013 16:59, Honton, Charles wrote:
> Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
> releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
> replicated to Maven Central?
>
>
Not sure that question makes sense as posed.
If a build is voted on, it is a
On 4/29/13 9:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
> to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
> one example among others (solvers, integration, ODE and maybe some parts
> of statistics may be
Le 30/04/2013 17:59, Honton, Charles a écrit :
> Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
> releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
> replicated to Maven Central?
I don't know, but nightly builds are already pushed to the snapshot
repository:
ht
Is there any policy concern with publishing the binaries of alpha
releases, after vote, to a Apache snapshot repository which is not
replicated to Maven Central?
Chas
On 4/30/13 8:28 AM, "sebb" wrote:
>On 30 April 2013 15:51, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz
On 30 April 2013 15:51, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>>
>>> On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
>>>
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
"developer"
category for tha
On 4/30/13 7:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>>> On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
"developer"
category for that component.
>>
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:36:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
"developer"
category for that component.
If his app _uses_ a Commons component, he is a "user" of
On 4/29/13 11:49 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 30.04.2013 00:01, Gilles wrote:
>> If someone doesn't develop a Commons component, he is not in the
>> "developer"
>> category for that component.
>> If his app _uses_ a Commons component, he is a "user" of that
>> component.
>> This kind of users sho
Le 30/04/2013 15:39, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> there was a request to change the BSN for commons-logging, which has
> already been done LOGGING-151.
>
> Any objections to make a 1.1.3 release which contains only this fix?
+1, the BSN in 1.1.2 breaks Eclipse on Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/c
Hi,
there was a request to change the BSN for commons-logging, which has
already been done LOGGING-151.
Any objections to make a 1.1.3 release which contains only this fix?
Thomas
Already in SVN ;)
Thank you sir!
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
> implemenations: -> implementations:
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 4/30/2013 1:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> ah, where?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:36 AM, A
implemenations: -> implementations:
-Adrian
On 4/30/2013 1:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
ah, where?
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
On 4/30/2013 1:32 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:32:24 2013
ah, where?
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
> On 4/30/2013 1:32 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Tue Apr 30 12:32:24 2013
>> New Revision: 1477592
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477592
>> Log:
>> [COD
Fixed and tracked with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-170
Gary
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'm not sure if metacpan is fine, but it has a working link for the
> package:
>
> https://metacpan.org/source/MSCHWERN/Text-Metaphone-1.96/
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, A
On 4/30/2013 1:32 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Apr 30 12:32:24 2013
New Revision: 1477592
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1477592
Log:
[CODEC-170] Link broken in Metaphone Javadoc.
Modified:
commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
commons/proper/co
Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild
X-Continuum-Project-Id: 71
X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Collections
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.
+1, looks really nice.
Would like to do the same for the Clusterer interface.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since 2.x series, we have been struggling in several areas with respect
> to algorithms API. The latest change was about optimizer, but it is only
>
I'm not sure if metacpan is fine, but it has a working link for the package:
https://metacpan.org/source/MSCHWERN/Text-Metaphone-1.96/
Hen
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Thank you for the report. Can you create a JIRA for this please? Do
> you have a fix perc
+1 to committing.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-884 has a patch to simplify
> FastDateFormat which I would like to apply.
>
> OK?
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
