Bad link in the javadocs

http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/apidocs/org/apache/commons/codec/language/Metaphone.html "Note, that this does not match the algorithm that ships with PHP, or the algorithm found in the Perl Text:Metaphone-1.96

[codec] Thoughs on Generics

Thoughts on generics for Codec I tried an approach to add generics to Codec here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/branches/generics I consider this (now old) experiment part success and part failure and I would like to share it here. I will call this experiment the ‘single

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Codec 1.8 Released

The Commons Codec team is pleased to announce the commons-codec 1.8 release! The codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats such as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to these widely used encoders and decoders, the codec package also maintains a collection of phonetic

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Collections -

Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild X-Continuum-Project-Id: 71 X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Collections Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.

Re: svn commit: r1476816 - in /commons/proper/codec/trunk: doap_codec.rdf pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

On 28 April 2013 20:45, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:34 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 28 April 2013 20:22, wrote: > > > > > Author: ggregory > > > Date: Sun Apr 28 19:22:44 2013 > > > New Revision: 1476816 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1476816 > > > Log: > > > Done with

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CODEC-166) Base64 could be faster

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 31/01/2013 00:35, sebb a écrit : > > The Fix version should only be added when the issue has been fixed, > > and should indicate the release in which the fix is available > > Just noticed this message, the 'Fix version' field can be set

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CODEC-166) Base64 could be faster

Le 31/01/2013 00:35, sebb a écrit : > The Fix version should only be added when the issue has been fixed, > and should indicate the release in which the fix is available Just noticed this message, the 'Fix version' field can be set before fixing the issue, this is necessary to build to roadmap wit

Re: svn commit: r1881 - in /release/commons/codec: binaries/ source/

On Apr 28, 2013, at 15:34, sebb wrote: > On 28 April 2013 20:10, wrote: > >> Author: ggregory >> Date: Sun Apr 28 19:10:06 2013 >> New Revision: 1881 >> >> Log: >> Remove 1.7 release now that 1.8 is out. > You should wait until after 1.8 is announced before deleting the old > version. Crud! You

Re: svn commit: r1476816 - in /commons/proper/codec/trunk: doap_codec.rdf pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:34 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 April 2013 20:22, wrote: > > > Author: ggregory > > Date: Sun Apr 28 19:22:44 2013 > > New Revision: 1476816 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1476816 > > Log: > > Done with 1.8, next release will be 2.0 > > > > > Why 2.0? > > Why not 1.9? >

Re: svn commit: r1476816 - in /commons/proper/codec/trunk: doap_codec.rdf pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml

On 28 April 2013 20:22, wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Sun Apr 28 19:22:44 2013 > New Revision: 1476816 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1476816 > Log: > Done with 1.8, next release will be 2.0 > > Why 2.0? Why not 1.9? > Modified: > commons/proper/codec/trunk/doap_codec.rdf > common

Re: svn commit: r1881 - in /release/commons/codec: binaries/ source/

On 28 April 2013 20:10, wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Sun Apr 28 19:10:06 2013 > New Revision: 1881 > > Log: > Remove 1.7 release now that 1.8 is out. > > You should wait until after 1.8 is announced before deleting the old version. Removed: > release/commons/codec/binaries/commons-codec

[codec] 1.8 released

Hi All, I released 1.8 but I am going to wait 24 hours for sending an announcement to give a change for the mirrors to pick up the released. Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Acti

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

On 28 April 2013 18:27, Henri Yandell wrote: > Is less attention paid to the API for an alpha/beta? > > If the idea is to be able to change the API (possibly breaking compatibility) then I don't think a Beta release is appropriate. That would be for an Alpha release - and we would have to make v

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

Is less attention paid to the API for an alpha/beta? Hen On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > There is nothing special. Even with "alpha", or "beta" as part of the > version number, it is technically an ASF release, and therefore subject to > the full blown process and rul

Re: [math] formulas in Javadoc (was Re: [jira] [Commented] (MATH-968) Pareto distribution is missing)

On 4/28/13 3:19 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 04/28/2013 12:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 04/27/2013 11:12 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> [switching to the dev list for the discussion] >>> >>> Le 26/04/2013 00:04, Gilles (JIRA) a écrit : [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

Re: [math] formulas in Javadoc (was Re: [jira] [Commented] (MATH-968) Pareto distribution is missing)

On 04/28/2013 12:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 04/27/2013 11:12 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> [switching to the dev list for the discussion] >> >> Le 26/04/2013 00:04, Gilles (JIRA) a écrit : >>> >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.

Re: [math] formulas in Javadoc (was Re: [jira] [Commented] (MATH-968) Pareto distribution is missing)

On 04/27/2013 11:12 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > [switching to the dev list for the discussion] > > Le 26/04/2013 00:04, Gilles (JIRA) a écrit : >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13642