[collections] beta release - howto

Hi, I have seen that the log4j team prepared a new beta for v2. As collections 4 is very close to be ready, I'd like to know more about the process of beta releases, as I am planning to do the same for collections 4. Can somebody enlighten me a bit? Thanks, Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

On 04/23/2013 10:52 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: > > NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src archive by mistake. >

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

is this vote dead? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, William Speirs wrote: > OK... I don't need my abacus to count votes and see that this failed. > > I'll work on the things folks mentioned and try for another release > this weekend. > > Thanks again for all of the help/feedback! > > Bill- > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

My +1. Gary On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: > > NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src

Re: Staging site?

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24 April 2013 17:53, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Thanks :) > > > > Did you mean a different url for your #2 below? > > > No. > > > > That seems to be the url > > i'm after (the shared directory), but you linked to a page on the Commons > > site.

Re: [CHAIN] Chain 2.0

On 24 April 2013 14:48, Steve Westwood wrote: > Christian Trimble recently sent to the list details of the XChain project > (see and< > https://github.com/ctrimble/xchain> ) > and pondered on whether aspects of this could be accommodated in > commons-chain. > Ther

Re: Staging site?

On 24 April 2013 17:53, Henri Yandell wrote: > Thanks :) > > Did you mean a different url for your #2 below? No. > That seems to be the url > i'm after (the shared directory), but you linked to a page on the Commons > site. > > Not sure I follow - that's not a link under commons.apache.org wh

Re: Staging site?

Thanks :) Did you mean a different url for your #2 below? That seems to be the url i'm after (the shared directory), but you linked to a page on the Commons site. Hen On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24 April 2013 05:28, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > So if you're using the SVN a

[CHAIN] Chain 2.0

Christian Trimble recently sent to the list details of the XChain project (see and ) and pondered on whether aspects of this could be accommodated in commons-chain. There has not been any response to this email (apologies to Chris

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 [Take 3]

Le 23/04/2013 22:52, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/) +1 to the release. And thanks, Gary, for your dedication! Luc > > Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6 > > Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are: > >

Re: Staging site?

On 24 April 2013 05:28, Henri Yandell wrote: > So if you're using the SVN approach, you check locally, then commit and go > hit publish on the CMS? > > If you commit to the source, I think that automatically does the build and updates the staging site. You can then check the staging site before