So if you're using the SVN approach, you check locally, then commit and go
hit publish on the CMS?
Hen
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site
> > (install a CMS plu
On 22 April 2013 18:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I looked at this a couple of month ago and found it equally confusing.
>
>
I think I've finally sorted out the issues...
skip() now skips the byte buffer (i.e. the same buffer as read) and AFAICT
mark/reset is working OK.
Also available() does now in
yes :-)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:58 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 22:53, Paul Benedict wrote:
>
> > FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are
> > broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content.
> >
> >
> Beans does not exist. I assume you meant Beanut
On 23 April 2013 22:53, Paul Benedict wrote:
> FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are
> broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content.
>
>
Beans does not exist. I assume you meant Beanutils?
> Paul
>
FYI, the site points to non-existent API and user guide. The links are
broken on both the LHS navigation and the main content.
Paul
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 21:02, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Gary,
> > >
> > > I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release,
> I
> > > was pretty nervous when doing
FYI, the website no longer hosts the API and user guide. The links are
broken.
Paul
On Apr 23, 2013, at 16:54, sebb wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 21:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/)
>>
>> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
>>
>> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are:
>>
>> NOTHING. In Nex
On 23 April 2013 21:52, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/)
>
> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
>
> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are:
>
> NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src archive by mistake.
>
>
On 23 April 2013 21:02, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I
> > was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really
> be
> > cool if this s
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, sigh, /again/)
Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 2 are:
NOTHING. In Nexus, I deleted the bin and src archive by mistake.
Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are:
NOTHING. In Nexus, I de
Canceled as the Nexus staging repo is missing -bin and -src files.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/)
>
> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
>
> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I
> was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really be
> cool if this somehow could be automated.
>
> Regarding the vote: I am not sur
Hi Gary,
I am very sorry that this happened to you. When I did my last release, I
was pretty nervous when doing this manual deletion step. It would really
be cool if this somehow could be automated.
Regarding the vote: I am not sure what exactly I have to check. This
time the staging reposit
On 23 April 2013 19:25, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site
> (install a CMS plugin or just modify SVN and test locally, I went with the
> latter). My commit was then built by the buildbot.
>
> Where is the staging site to look at the build
Looking at the site building docs, I could see how to modify the site
(install a CMS plugin or just modify SVN and test locally, I went with the
latter). My commit was then built by the buildbot.
Where is the staging site to look at the buildbot output so I can then be
happy pressing Publish? I co
This VOTE is open for at least 72 hours until April 26 2013 at 1:00 PM EST.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/)
>
> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
>
> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VO
On 23 April 2013 15:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-04-23, sebb wrote:
>
> > As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them
> in
> > Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging
> > area [1] before the vote starts.
>
> > It would make the
On 2013-04-23, sebb wrote:
> As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them in
> Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging
> area [1] before the vote starts.
> It would make the reviewers job slighly harder - one extra URL to download
> and
Some follow-up: the .ASC hashes can (should) be deleted before the vote
starts.
As to the (non-Maven) tarballs: another approach would be to create them in
Nexus as per usual, but move them (copy/delete) to the svnpubsub staging
area [1] before the vote starts.
It would make the reviewers job sli
My +1.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/)
>
> Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
>
> Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are:
>
> NOTHING. I deleted too many checksum files in Nexu
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.8-RC4 (yes, /again/)
Commons Codec 1.8 requires a minimum of Java 1.6
Changes from 1.8-RC4 VOTE take 1 are:
NOTHING. I deleted too many checksum files in Nexus before trying to
release the repo, so I created a new staging repo:
https://reposi
On 23 April 2013 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> For record, I deleted the wrong checksum files, so I had to redo the
> staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-129/
>
>
In that case, I think you need to restart the VOTE.
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 20
For record, I deleted the wrong checksum files, so I had to redo the
staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-129/
Gary
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> My +1.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following
>> > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
>> >
>> > In particular:
>> >
>> > "Befo
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following
> > https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
> >
> > In particular:
> >
> > "Before you close<
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-arti
On 23 April 2013 02:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
> To release Codec 1.8, I just tried following
> https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
>
> In particular:
>
> "Before you close<
> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#close-stage>the
> staging repository you must remove
27 matches
Mail list logo
