Re: [DBUTILS] Working on a DBUtils 2.0 Release Candidate

2013-03-10 Thread sebb
On 10 March 2013 15:53, William Speirs wrote: > As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for > DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes, > so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-) > > A few issues I'm running into: > > 1) Clirr is

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread sebb
On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >>> Any thoughts about it? >> >> There are 3 Clirr errors: >> >> Error Return type

Re: [DBUTILS] Working on a DBUtils 2.0 Release Candidate

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/10/2013 04:53 PM, William Speirs wrote: > As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for > DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes, > so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-) > > A few issues I'm running into: > > 1) Clirr is

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Commons-FileUpload 1.3 based on RC1

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/10/2013 08:09 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > thanks a lot for your help, very appreciated! :) > >> Critical >> >> * FILEUPLOAD-212: after looking more carefully into it I think it is >>invalid, see the attached test >> > > +1 I'd close it as `not a problem` > >> * FILEUP

[CANCEL][VOTE] release Apache Commons-FileUpload 1.3 based on RC1

2013-03-10 Thread Simone Tripodi
mainly due to FILEUPLOAD-195 and FILEUPLOAD-228, the current vote is no longer valid, I'll try to cut a new RC ASAP. best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM,

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Commons-FileUpload 1.3 based on RC1

2013-03-10 Thread Simone Tripodi
>> btw. I am unsure about this change, as it now only looks at the >> Content-Length header. If none is set, the result it -1, but before we >> were returning request.getContentLength(). > > as you stated in FILEUPLOAD-179 I agree that "If none is present -1 is > returned, so I guess it would be be

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 10/03/2013 19:47, Phil Steitz a écrit : > On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >>> Any thoughts about it? >>> >>> Luc >>> >>>

Re: [math] Scaling arrays

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/8/13 12:14 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote: > Hello, > > I may be missing it somewhere, but I am surprised there is no function for > scaling arrays in MathArrays.java or somewhere else. > > - Am I stupidly missing it? Probably not. Closest thing is probably normalize in MathArrays. > >

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Commons-FileUpload 1.3 based on RC1

2013-03-10 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Thomas, thanks a lot for your help, very appreciated! :) > Critical > > * FILEUPLOAD-212: after looking more carefully into it I think it is >invalid, see the attached test > +1 I'd close it as `not a problem` > * FILEUPLOAD-193: as stated in the comments already, this was most >li

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >> Any thoughts about it? >> >> Luc >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/10/13 10:56 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit : >> On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >>> Any thoughts about it? >>> >>> Luc >>> >>> -

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. > Any thoughts about it? > > Luc > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Phil, Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit : > On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >> Any thoughts about it? >> >> Luc >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Thomas, Le 10/03/2013 17:44, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 03/10/2013 05:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts a

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. > Any thoughts about it? > > Luc > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Commons-FileUpload 1.3 based on RC1

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/09/2013 04:02 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> I do not think its the responsibility of the users that our provided >> software is bug-free. If they do submit patches, great, if not, somebody >> has to step in. >> > > I agree, but at least a patch with unit test that proves the issue, > would ce

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/10/2013 05:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >>> Any thoughts about it? >> >> There are 3 Clirr errors: >> >> Error Return type

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. >> Any thoughts about it? > > There are 3 Clirr errors: > > Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to > o

[DBUTILS] Working on a DBUtils 2.0 Release Candidate

2013-03-10 Thread William Speirs
As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes, so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-) A few issues I'm running into: 1) Clirr is trying to compare my 2.0 release with version 1.5. How do I

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Gary Gregory
That means 4.0 and all that entails (Maven coords and package change) or fix the Clirr errors. Gary On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. > > Any thoughts a

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. > Any thoughts about it? There are 3 Clirr errors: Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to org.apache.commons.math3.dfp.Dfp Error Method 'protected org

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CodeStyle" by sebbapache

2013-03-10 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "CodeStyle" page has been changed by sebbapache: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8 Comment: Add @deprecated/@since rules ||SVN keywords: $Date$

[BeanUtils][RTC] BEANUTILS-422 - getPropertyType return null on second descendant class

2013-03-10 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, we have this bug filed for BeanUtils, that seems to be related to generic collections used for indexed properties in conjunction with Java 7. In summary, when using a List instead of a untyped List for an indexed property, PropertyUtils.getPropertyType will return null. There is a proposed so