On 5 March 2013 00:10, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/3/5 sebb :
>> On 4 March 2013 20:57, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2013/3/4 sebb :
I just fixed the Digester download page by adding
download_digester.cgi to to
/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-digester/
Is th
2013/3/5 sebb :
> On 4 March 2013 20:57, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2013/3/4 sebb :
>>> I just fixed the Digester download page by adding
>>> download_digester.cgi to to
>>> /websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-digester/
>>>
>>> Is there any need to have this file present anywhere else?
On 4 March 2013 20:58, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> why not modifying the file in sources and regenerate the site ?
That would have been extra work, and probably have resulted in a huge
commit mail.
Also, I just wanted to fix it quickly.
>
> 2013/3/4 :
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Mon Mar 4 18:32:41 201
On 4 March 2013 20:57, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/3/4 sebb :
>> I just fixed the Digester download page by adding
>> download_digester.cgi to to
>> /websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-digester/
>>
>> Is there any need to have this file present anywhere else?
>>
>> i.e. if it is not
why not modifying the file in sources and regenerate the site ?
2013/3/4 :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Mon Mar 4 18:32:41 2013
> New Revision: 852981
>
> Log:
> Latest version is 3.2; 3.3 has yet to be released
>
> Modified:
> websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-net/download_net.h
2013/3/4 sebb :
> I just fixed the Digester download page by adding
> download_digester.cgi to to
> /websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-digester/
>
> Is there any need to have this file present anywhere else?
>
> i.e. if it is not added to src/site/resources, will it get lost when
>
Am 04.03.2013 20:36, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Delete them.
+1
IIRC, it was part of older release instructions to create such links.
The instructions have been updated, but probably after the last Digester
release.
Oliver
Gary
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:34 PM, sebb wrote:
Some components
Delete them.
Gary
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> Some components have "current" links in the top-level dist/ directories.
>
> For example:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/digester/
>
> has several such links.
>
> These are presumably supposed to always point to the curren
Some components have "current" links in the top-level dist/ directories.
For example:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/digester/
has several such links.
These are presumably supposed to always point to the current latest release.
However, they are tricky to maintain (perhaps more so now we ar
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
> Any thoughts about it?
Maybe somebody wants to take a look at MATH-891.
I created a patch but was unsure about it due to the dynamic cast.
Thomas
---
On 03/04/2013 07:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 17:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 03/04/2013 06:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 04/03/2013 15:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
hmm weird, my email client (gmail) does not show it.
>>>
>>> That is a "feature" of gmail. You have two choices. Ge
On 4 March 2013 17:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 06:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 15:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> hmm weird, my email client (gmail) does not show it.
>>
>> That is a "feature" of gmail. You have two choices. Get used to it or
>> use a less "helpful" mai
On 03/04/2013 06:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 15:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> hmm weird, my email client (gmail) does not show it.
>
> That is a "feature" of gmail. You have two choices. Get used to it or
> use a less "helpful" mai client.
Normally I get my own messages to the maili
On 4 March 2013 17:30, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at the commons net release notes:
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/changes-report.html
> I see that release 3.3 is TBA, but looking at the downloads page:
>http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/downl
Hi all,
Looking at the commons net release notes:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/changes-report.html
I see that release 3.3 is TBA, but looking at the downloads page:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/download_net.cgi
I see a commons net 3.3 download.
Since I'm not
On 04/03/2013 15:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> hmm weird, my email client (gmail) does not show it.
That is a "feature" of gmail. You have two choices. Get used to it or
use a less "helpful" mai client.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On 4 March 2013 15:55, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > I tried to send
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
>
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> > > 2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thoma
2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > 2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried to send the announ
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
>
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to send the announcement in the morning with my
> apache.orgemail
2013/3/4 Thomas Neidhart
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried to send the announcement in the morning with my apache.orgemail
> > > address, but nothing came through so far.
> > >
> > > Does anybody k
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
>
>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
>> Any thoughts about it?
>>
>
> How soon?
> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
>
I did look into this one
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to send the announcement in the morning with my apache.org email
> > address, but nothing came through so far.
> >
> > Does anybody know if there is a problem with this atm? I
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
> > Hello.
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> >
> >>
> >> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
> >> Any thoughts about it?
> >
> > How soon?
>
> Say next week for example.
>
> > There are many unresolved i
Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
> Hello.
Hi Gilles,
>
>>
>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
>> Any thoughts about it?
>
> How soon?
Say next week for example.
> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936)
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917).
Releasing would be fine
On 04/03/2013 12:30, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to send the announcement in the morning with my apache.org email
> address, but nothing came through so far.
>
> Does anybody know if there is a problem with this atm? I did not receive an
> error though.
It is working for me.
Mark
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
2013/3/4 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2013-03-03, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 3 March 2013 17:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>> I'd like to cut a 1.5.0 release sometime this coming week.
>
>> OK by me, but note that the dist/ deployment process is currently
>> changing ...
>
> Yes, thanks, I'll be looking out for
> $Revision$ is usally enough; if you really want a date, use $id$
+1
> Are you okay with this or should I revert the commit anyway?
no needs to revert, just update the sources according to Seb's suggestion
alles gute,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejou
2 more questions:
1. Could I compile just the fileupload project (at my first attempt, it
complains about missing parent pom.xml)
2. Is the svn repository at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/
I am behind a corporate proxy, so I'm not sure about these things. For 2. I
g
2013/3/3 sebb :
> On 3 March 2013 18:24, wrote:
>> Author: olamy
>> Date: Sun Mar 3 18:24:19 2013
>> New Revision: 1452086
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452086
>> Log:
>> upgrade parent
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/validator/trunk/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: commons/proper/validator/tr
2013/3/3 sebb
> On 3 March 2013 19:27, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Hi sebb,
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/3 sebb
> >
> >> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
> >> > Author: britter
> >> > Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
> >> > New Revision: 1452037
> >> >
> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
> >> > Log:
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
