why? where did you read email address shall be not in explicit form?
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sat Feb 23 15:38:17 2013
On 02/23/2013 05:53 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Christian Schneider from the felix project has posted some useful
> information to the felix dev ML [1].
> Maybe we should just add document for using JCL in OSGi (via pax logging
> for example) to the website?
Thanks, sounds like a good plan.
I ha
Christian Schneider from the felix project has posted some useful
information to the felix dev ML [1].
Maybe we should just add document for using JCL in OSGi (via pax logging
for example) to the website?
Benedikt
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40felix.apache.org/msg28887.html
2013/2/22 Be
Hi,
I have worked through a few issues. I'm concentrating on bugs right now and
try to sort them into 1.8.4 and later than 1.8.4. I've asked reporters to
create patches against trunk, although I don't now how much feedback we
will get with this, as some of the issues date back several years.
Bene
congrats for your Chinese skills! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:28 PM, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sat Feb 23 14:28:36 2013
> New Revision: 1449325
On 02/21/2013 09:29 PM, Julius Davies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to go ahead with my original patch, or at least
> understand better how I can improve it, or why it's not acceptable.
>
> Thomas did manage to improve our numbers with a very nice & small
> patch (here's a benchmark comparison):
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hallo Thomas,
>
> o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
> be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
In general, yes, but this is a bug fix release.
Cheers,
Jörg
-
Hallo Thomas,
o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/23 Thomas Neidhart
> On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote
On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.3:
>
> == Fixed Bugs ==
>
> * DataSourceClassPathResolver will now correctly set the DataSource
>
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
h
On 2013-02-23 09:01, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/23/2013 12:21 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2013-02-22 21:38, t...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: tn
>>> Date: Fri Feb 22 20:38:59 2013
>>> New Revision: 1449206
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449206
>>> Log:
>>> Fix jar deploy, add osgi b
On 02/23/2013 12:21 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-02-22 21:38, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Fri Feb 22 20:38:59 2013
>> New Revision: 1449206
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449206
>> Log:
>> Fix jar deploy, add osgi bundle metadata.
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/
12 matches
Mail list logo
