To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
2013/1/15 Thomas Neidhart
> On 01/15/2013 07:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > On 2013-01-12 15:03, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >
> > Hi Thomas
> >
> > A while back I made changes to the Maven build so that it produces the
> > same output as the Ant build. The should mean that we can get ri
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
> > On 2013-01-13 19:14, t...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: tn
> >> Date: Sun Jan 13 18:14:24 2013
> >> New Revision: 1432688
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=14
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-01-13 19:14, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Sun Jan 13 18:14:24 2013
>> New Revision: 1432688
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432688&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Upgrade test dependencies: log4j 1.2.17, avalong-fr
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to do a similar cleanup as for email also for logging and
> aim for a 1.2 release in the coming weeks. The things I have in mind:
>
> * update to Java 5
+1, because it also means that we can simplify the code using the stuff from
the c
On 2013-01-13 19:14, t...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Sun Jan 13 18:14:24 2013
> New Revision: 1432688
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432688&view=rev
> Log:
> Upgrade test dependencies: log4j 1.2.17, avalong-framework 4.1.5
These are not test dependencies - they are real de
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
>> I'm -1 on this change. I don't see any reason to do it. We don't need
>> features from a more recent Java version in commons-logging. As others
>> have said: most users of commons-logging are old and older apps.
>
> In general I am fine wi
On 01/15/2013 07:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-01-12 15:03, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Thomas
>
> A while back I made changes to the Maven build so that it produces the
> same output as the Ant build. The should mean that we can get rid of the
> old Ant build if we want to.
I
Java 5 or 6 is fine with me as a new req. This is a new version. No one is
forced to upgrade. If a volunteer wants to do the work, that's fine with me.
Gary
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-01-15 19:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:17 PM, D
On 2013-01-15 19:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> On 2013-01-12 15:03, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi Thomas
>>
>> A while back I made changes to the Maven build so that it produces the
>> same output as the Ant build. The should mean
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2013-01-12 15:03, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Thomas
>
> A while back I made changes to the Maven build so that it produces the
> same output as the Ant build. The should mean that we can get rid of the
> old Ant build if we w
On 2013-01-15 09:56, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/01/2013 19:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Basically I am +1 on mov
On 2013-01-12 15:03, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas
A while back I made changes to the Maven build so that it produces the
same output as the Ant build. The should mean that we can get rid of the
old Ant build if we want to.
One thing that I'd like to do is to restructure the source code
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
> > lots more and some whole sections that need to be rewritten.
> > Patches are most welcome.
> >
> >
Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.12 based on RC1 is ready.
It contains several fixes for regressions found in previous release(s).
Binaries and sources for testing are at [1], dist layout is at [2],
generated site can be found at [3]. Tag is [4] which will be renamed to
COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_12 if voted.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
> lots more and some whole sections that need to be rewritten.
> Patches are most welcome.
>
> One thing we might want to consider is creating separate test
> packages for th
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 19:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2013 17:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>
Basically I am +1 on moving to newer JDKs. But in this case I just see
use
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
20 matches
Mail list logo
