[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

Adding named params won't break things (actually I was thinking of adding this to a 1.x release as well), but removing deprecated code will. Also, I was thinking of switching to only supporting named params in the 2.x branch. I guess the real question is, do folks think that forcing the use of nam

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

We only need to change the coordinates if the package name changes to account for BC breakage. Gary On Dec 13, 2012, at 17:47, William Speirs wrote: > I just submitted > DBUTILS-105 to > add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking th

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

On 13 December 2012 22:47, William Speirs wrote: > I just submitted > DBUTILS-105 to > add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped > that up with DBUTILS-95 > and DB

[DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

I just submitted DBUTILS-105 to add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped that up with DBUTILS-95 and DBUTILS-92

[email] Request for review

Hi, I performed the changes as agreed before. If somebody has some time to review the changes, I would be very grateful! Thanks, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-ma

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [math] pearson and spearman correlation runtime complexity

Can you say more about how you implemented these? The Pearson coefficient should be quite simple. A few passes through the data should suffice and it can probably be done in one pass, especially if you aren't worried about 1ULP accuracy. The Spearman coefficient should be no worse than the cost

[math] pearson and spearman correlation runtime complexity

sry wrong list. can someone put this in the users mailinglist plz? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[math] pearson and spearman correlation runtime complexity

Hi again, I tried to implement the pearson and spearman algorithm myself and the computation took very long. That is why I now use the commons math solution. I am curious about the runtime complexity of the Pearson and the Spearman correlation coefficient. Can someone help me with that? Gree

[VOTE][CANCEL] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC5. > > This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC4 > > +) update index and building page with correct information wrt Java >compatibility > +)