Hi Greg,
the pattern matches (also) a single space that gets replaced by a single
space. Therefor are most of the actual performed replacements completely
superfluous, since I expect this to be the common case. The pattern should
be something along "[\\s&&[^ ]]\\s*".
- Jörg
---
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi,
I cloned the commons-lang repository from github and encountered a failed
test in FastDateParserTest. Here is the output from junit:
Testcase: testParses took 0.015 sec
FAILED
ja_JP 1940 G/y/M/d/h/a/E/Z America/New_York expected: but was:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ja_JP 1940 G
On Nov 8, 2012, at 17:28, "Oberhuber, Martin"
wrote:
> NET-466 has been fixed (thanks!), so could a release be cut ?
Sounds good to me. Let's see what the rest of the ML thinks.
Gary
>
> Commons Net 3.1 is unusable for us due to NET-466.
>
> I've seen an offer for providing a patch to NET-481;
3.1 is unusable for us as well -- and /seems /to all be due to NET-466.
We've had to revert to 3.0.1 and been anxiously awaiting a 3.2 or 3.1.1
that fixes this.
On 11/8/2012 4:27 PM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
NET-466 has been fixed (thanks!), so could a release be cut ?
Commons Net 3.1 is unu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
NET-466 has been fixed (thanks!), so could a release be cut ?
Commons Net 3.1 is unusable for us due to NET-466.
I've seen an offer for providing a patch to NET-481; just contacted the
submitter.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind River
direc
On 11/8/12 9:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi,
2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100,
On 11/8/12 8:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
On 11/07/2012 10:40 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/7/12 8:06 PM, James Carman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
And it does not fit what I consider commons naming. Recall the recent
rename from sanselan to imaging.
Yeah, we like to use more concrete names related to t
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:00:52PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
> >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> >>> Hi Patrick,
> >>>
> >>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer
On 11/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you t
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
2012/11/8 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
>> > I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you to
>> > specific the ranking algorithm only.
>> >
>> > As fa
On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:48, sebb wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 12:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> Do you plan on fixing this since you committed the failing test?
>
> There is a proposed fix which seems to work, but someone else needs to
> check that the fix is correct.
> I'm not familiar w
On 8 November 2012 12:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Do you plan on fixing this since you committed the failing test?
There is a proposed fix which seems to work, but someone else needs to
check that the fix is correct.
I'm not familiar with the Java buffer classes used.
> Or was the com
+1
Gary
On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:46, sebb wrote:
> The Issue type setting for IMAGING JIRA (Default Issue Type Scheme) is
> different from the standard used elsewhere in Commons (Apache Default
> Issue Type Scheme).
> The IMAGING scheme includes items such as "Question" which we don't
> use and mig
On Nov 8, 2012, at 4:41, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/11/2012 02:03, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
>> IIUC, Cocoon (and others?) also need this, so it makes sense for it
>> to be a component on its own and - assuming it stays small - in
>> Commons. I have not looked carefully at the code, but it does
On 8 November 2012 12:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 08/11/2012 12:53, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>>
>>> I don't think it's necessary to bug the Infra for this, we can configure
>>> it ourself.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I have been able to do that once, but I c
On Nov 7, 2012, at 23:40, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/7/12 8:06 PM, James Carman wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> And it does not fit what I consider commons naming. Recall the recent
>>> rename from sanselan to imaging.
>>>
>> Yeah, we like to use more concrete
On 08/11/2012 11:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/11/2012 12:53, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
>> I don't think it's necessary to bug the Infra for this, we can configure
>> it ourself.
>
> I'm pretty sure I have been able to do that once, but I can't find how
> to do it now. So let's ask to the In
Hi Sebb,
Do you plan on fixing this since you committed the failing test? Or
was the commit without a @Ignore an omission?
Gary
On Nov 8, 2012, at 3:29, Gump wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http
Le 08/11/2012 12:53, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> I don't think it's necessary to bug the Infra for this, we can configure
> it ourself.
I'm pretty sure I have been able to do that once, but I can't find how
to do it now. So let's ask to the Infra team :)
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
Le 08/11/2012 12:46, sebb a écrit :
> The Issue type setting for IMAGING JIRA (Default Issue Type Scheme) is
> different from the standard used elsewhere in Commons (Apache Default
> Issue Type Scheme).
> The IMAGING scheme includes items such as "Question" which we don't
> use and might (has?) lea
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 08/11/2012 12:39, luc a écrit :
> Yes, I have just added you to the administration list for this component.
> Could you try and see if it works for you ?
Thank you Luc, I can access the administration for IMAGING now. The
project doesn't seem to be configured like the other components, the
comm
The Issue type setting for IMAGING JIRA (Default Issue Type Scheme) is
different from the standard used elsewhere in Commons (Apache Default
Issue Type Scheme).
The IMAGING scheme includes items such as "Question" which we don't
use and might (has?) lead people to believe that JIRA is appropriate
f
Le 2012-11-08 11:37, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
It seems the permissions for Commons Imaging in JIRA are not properly
configured, I'm unable to operate on the issues.
Is there anyone with sufficient rights to fix that ? Luc ?
Yes, I have just added you to the administration list for this
compon
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:39:00AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> > I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you to
> > specific the ranking algorithm only.
> >
> > As far as NaN and the Spearman correlation,
It seems the permissions for Commons Imaging in JIRA are not properly
configured, I'm unable to operate on the issues.
Is there anyone with sufficient rights to fix that ? Luc ?
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Le 08/11/2012 03:04, sebb a écrit :
> According to the Droids status page [1] there are 8 committers.
> That is more than several TLPs, including HttpComponents and JMeter.
There are only 2 active committers according to the SVN log, and 75% of
the commits coming from a single committer over the
Le 08/11/2012 02:03, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> IIUC, Cocoon (and others?) also need this, so it makes sense for it
> to be a component on its own and - assuming it stays small - in
> Commons. I have not looked carefully at the code, but it does not
> look so much like "a crawler" to me as a framewo
Hi Patrick,
On 11/07/2012 04:37 PM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> I agree that it would be nice to have a constructor that allows you to
> specific the ranking algorithm only.
>
> As far as NaN and the Spearman correlation, maybe we should add a default
> strategy of NaNStrategy.FAIL so that an excepti
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi all,
Le 2012-11-08 05:40, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 11/7/12 8:06 PM, James Carman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
And it does not fit what I consider commons naming. Recall the
recent
rename from sanselan to imaging.
Yeah, we like to use more concrete names rel
40 matches
Mail list logo
