To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hello.
This issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-872
is about a workaround similar to one already existing for
"SimplexOptimizer", i.e. having a specific method (setter) to set
data that cannot be passed through the common API ("optimize" method) and
should not be specified at constr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
I like the enum idea too.
G
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 18:24, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Matt Benson wrote:
> >
> >> Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
> >> simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and paramet
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
>
>> If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
>> version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
>> its Builder interface?
>
>
> Yes, we are
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
Yes, we are going to switch to [lang] 3.x. I would like to use the
Builder interfa
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
$0.02,
Matt
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:15 PM, wrote:
> Author: oheger
> Date: Wed Oct 3 19:15:27 2012
> New Revision: 1393690
>
> URL: h
On 3 October 2012 18:24, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
>> simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
>> accordingly?
>
> Because the algorithm is different (although similar) every time and
Matt Benson wrote:
> Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
> simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
> accordingly?
Because the algorithm is different (although similar) every time and not all
combinations are implemented?
Honestly, we wo
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > sebb wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >> I find the naming convention rather difficult to follow.
>> >>
>> >> For example, the letter 's' sometimes means 'array' and sometimes
>> >> means
Also note that we have org.apache.commons.*io*.EndianUtils which does not
do the same thing but it a good class name.
Gary
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, James Carman wrote:
> Agreed. This is very cryptic, IMHO.
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> > Urgh; I find these m
Agreed. This is very cryptic, IMHO.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
> simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
> accordingly?
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Gary Greg
Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we
simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
accordingly?
Matt
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>> >
>
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> >
> > sebb wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> I find the naming convention rather difficult to follow.
> >>
> >> For example, the letter 's' sometimes means 'array' and sometimes means
> >> 'string' Also M0 is not obvious as an
Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> sebb wrote:
[snip]
>> I find the naming convention rather difficult to follow.
>>
>> For example, the letter 's' sometimes means 'array' and sometimes means
>> 'string' Also M0 is not obvious as an abbreviation, nor is BeM0
>
> I am all open for better names, all *I*
Hi Damjan,
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> You wouldn't believe it, but one of the most invaluable testing tools
> for commons-imaging I've discovered has been an x86 assembler :-).
>
> Why? Because images are binary files which often use internal offsets
> to portions of the image. An assembl
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
23 matches
Mail list logo
