Hi,
2012/9/18 Sébastien Brisard :
> Hi,
> thanks for these answers.
> I agree that apt does not seem much better than xdoc, but it at least
> offers table formatting and so on.
> So can anyone recommend a good format? Otherwise, I'm quite happy with xhtml.
>
> An option I'm going to look at at wor
Hi,
I'd like to make a move on this issue. Does everyone agree with what's
already written in this ticket (not much, I'm afraid).
Does anyone want to add anything to the formatting section? This
should be something we are particularly attached to, and that can't be
revealed by the checkstyle report
Hi,
thanks for these answers.
I agree that apt does not seem much better than xdoc, but it at least
offers table formatting and so on.
So can anyone recommend a good format? Otherwise, I'm quite happy with xhtml.
An option I'm going to look at at work is sphinx [1]. It has become
widely spread in
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
I dont know if there is any read only public server.
Can you just roll in cifs provider into the trunk for 2.1? I will be
your first beta customer ( even thou we are already perform intensive
test in house )
-D
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I could see releasing 2.1 AS
On 17 September 2012 22:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 17/09/2012 21:24, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Sébastien,
>
>> I'm looking into extending the user's guide of Commons-Math for
>> special functions. xdoc seems to be offering only very crude
>> formatting possibiliities, and apt se
On 17 September 2012 20:26, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 17 September 2012 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Duncan Jones
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
>>> >> On 17 September
Le 17/09/2012 21:24, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi Sébastien,
> I'm looking into extending the user's guide of Commons-Math for
> special functions. xdoc seems to be offering only very crude
> formatting possibiliities, and apt seems much better. It should work
> out of the box, alongside
I could see releasing 2.1 ASAP which is on my to-do list. fixing We could
then roll out a 2.1.1 or 2.2 with this code in it. But there still would
need to be some kind of testing. Is there a public server that could be
used for at least read-only tests?
Gary
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Dan T
perhaps, we can release smb provider as is at commons-vfs and mark it
as experimental? I see a number of apache project doing that.
-D
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I took a closer look at writing unit test case for vfs-cifs and came
> to a conclusion that th
On 2012-09-17 21:24, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking into extending the user's guide of Commons-Math for
> special functions. xdoc seems to be offering only very crude
> formatting possibiliities, and apt seems much better. It should work
> out of the box, alongside with existing xdoc
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
On 17 September 2012 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Duncan Jones
>> wrote:
>> > On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
>> >> On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, Sep 17
Hi,
I'm looking into extending the user's guide of Commons-Math for
special functions. xdoc seems to be offering only very crude
formatting possibiliities, and apt seems much better. It should work
out of the box, alongside with existing xdoc pages. However, I can't
seem to make it work, and I was
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Duncan Jones
> wrote:
> > On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
> >> On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >>>
> Hell
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
> > On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>> We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
>> On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
Hello,
We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit 4, IMO.
On 17 September 2012 19:13, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit 4, IMO. The
>>> only thing is that as a rule we'd rather that chang
On 17 September 2012 19:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit 4, IMO. The
>> only thing is that as a rule we'd rather that changeset be separate
>> from another, so I'd recommend provi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hello,
> We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit 4, IMO. The
> only thing is that as a rule we'd rather that changeset be separate
> from another, so I'd recommend providing multiple patches, possibly
> submitted in separate
Hello,
We'd love to have our whole testsuite updated to JUnit 4, IMO. The
only thing is that as a rule we'd rather that changeset be separate
from another, so I'd recommend providing multiple patches, possibly
submitted in separate JIRA issues.
Matt
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Duncan Jon
Hi,
While working on a patch for LANG-799, I ran into a problem where I
couldn't use JUnit4 Assume.* methods because the DateUtilsTest.java
extends TestCase (forcing JUnit3 behaviour), rather than using JUnit4
annotations.
Is it rude to adjust this class to use JUnit4 annotations? There seem
to b
Hi.
> Honestly: the incredibly complex and mostly undocumented process for doing
> a release. There are various incompatible bits in at least 4 different
> places:
> * http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html - is meant to be the
> official Commons release documentation, but it's out of dat
Hi Gilles,
2012/9/17 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 17/09/2012 11:50, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> OK, I give up. Lets do option 2. Just warn users in the User Guide
>>> somewhere that our APIs are in general not null-safe and unless the
>>>
Le 17/09/2012 11:50, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> OK, I give up. Lets do option 2. Just warn users in the User Guide
>> somewhere that our APIs are in general not null-safe and unless the
>> javadoc explicitly allows nulls, they can e
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> OK, I give up. Lets do option 2. Just warn users in the User Guide
> somewhere that our APIs are in general not null-safe and unless the
> javadoc explicitly allows nulls, they can expect NPE when passing nulls.
Thanks, Phil; we are
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
> support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
> we should try to improve this.
>
> I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
34 matches
Mail list logo
