Hello all,
I took a closer look at writing unit test case for vfs-cifs and came
to a conclusion that the test cases are tough to develop since there
is no available embedded cifs server available ( note that the current
test cases for other provider heavily depends on embedded server like
ftp, sft
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 2012-08-30 23:18, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> You've stumbled upon
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-285
> due to the recent upgrade of the ASF JIRA instance.
The 2.8 version of the Changes Plugin has now been released. Do you want
me to add the necessary configuration to use it i
On 15/09/2012 18:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
> There were 3 PMC +1 in addition to Thomas', so we are good.
Cool. I thought it was odd the RM wasn't in the list. I didn't realise
Thomas snipped the remaining vote.
I assume you looked at the commons list rather than the commons-pms list.
Mark
--
There were 3 PMC +1 in addition to Thomas', so we are good.
Gary
On Sep 15, 2012, at 13:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> On 09/14/2012 05:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Who is that then:
>>
>> I do not know what you mean, I just wanted to point out that I am not a
>> PMC me
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>On 09/14/2012 05:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Who is that then:
>
>I do not know what you mean, I just wanted to point out that I am not a
>PMC member, thus my vote should not be counted as such to avoid any
>confusion in the future.
>
>Thomas
>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at
I understand. I misread the page then. Apologies.
Gary
On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:35, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 05:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Who is that then:
>
> I do not know what you mean, I just wanted to point out that I am not a
> PMC member, thus my vote should not be counte
On 09/14/2012 05:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Who is that then:
I do not know what you mean, I just wanted to point out that I am not a
PMC member, thus my vote should not be counted as such to avoid any
confusion in the future.
Thomas
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are (
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
18 matches
Mail list logo
