To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
I will second what others have said. There really is no way to effectively
review an 800k patch. If it is that big largely because it is including a
jackrabbit jar directly into the project I would probably not be in favor of
that. I am not a fan of directly including project A's jars directl
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
I did not see a JIRA issue for this on the ML. Did I miss it? More
likely it was not created. An 800K patch, yeah, that should be broken
up I suspect...
Gary
On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:32, sebb wrote:
> On 23 August 2012 14:17, Syao Work wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we have some patches for VFS trunk ver
One thing to watch out for here is the loadClass expects a binary
name. I think forName does not, at least the Javadoc does not say so
(and I cannot experiment ATM, on my phone).
Gary
On Aug 25, 2012, at 14:58, Oliver Heger wrote:
> In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, b
Thank you Christian, I intend to take another look at this and the
code base this coming week and see what shape we are in for a release
candidate. All other eyes welcome to take a look, patch and so on.
Gary
On Aug 25, 2012, at 19:09, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> Am Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hello
Am Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:28:55 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>
> > On 08/22/2012 01:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > > I did the SVN update from E and the build from a Win7 command
> > > line.
> >
> > Does it still not work for you
Hello Luc.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:31:41AM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 24/08/2012 01:35, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:00:56PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 8/23/12 5:37 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>> Le 23/08/2012 13:37, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On T
In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, boolean,
ClassLoader) is used to load classes dynamically (e.g. in
ClassUtils.getClass()).
According to the book "OSGi in action" (written by guys from the Felix
community) it is recommended to use ClassLoader.loadClass() instead. Th
16 matches
Mail list logo