To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Le 24/08/2012 16:09, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello Sébastien.
>
>>>
> [...]
I see that's another area where everyone has its own opinion because
of various experiences. I was previously in favor of exceptions, but
maybe it's too much for such a low-level component as a
On 8/24/12 8:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/08/2012 16:22, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/24/12 7:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 22/08/2012 13:51, Phil Steitz wrote:
Any feedback on the patch? Should I go ahead and apply the [pool]
patch?
>>> Sorry for the very late review. Some comment
On 24/08/2012 16:22, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/24/12 7:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/08/2012 13:51, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Any feedback on the patch? Should I go ahead and apply the [pool]
>>> patch?
>> Sorry for the very late review. Some comments/questions on the pool2
>> part (I haven't lo
On 8/24/12 7:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/08/2012 13:51, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Any feedback on the patch? Should I go ahead and apply the [pool]
>> patch?
> Sorry for the very late review. Some comments/questions on the pool2
> part (I haven't looked at DBCP):
>
> - Why not add abandoned supp
On 22/08/2012 13:51, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Any feedback on the patch? Should I go ahead and apply the [pool]
> patch?
Sorry for the very late review. Some comments/questions on the pool2
part (I haven't looked at DBCP):
- Why not add abandoned support to GKOP as well as GOP?
- I wasn't convinced
Hello Sébastien.
> >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > I see that's another area where everyone has its own opinion because
> > > of various experiences. I was previously in favor of exceptions, but
> > > maybe it's too much for such a low-level component as a standard or
> > > special function. So I am n
Also please update to the *latest* from trunk, I just updated the main POM
to Commons-Parent 26 (a small change).
Gary
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Note that the WebDav tests run an (old version) of JR.
>
> Make sure all the test unit tests pass when you run the Maven
Hi Gilles,
2012/8/24 Gilles Sadowski
>
> Hi.
>
> > > [...]
> >
> > I see that's another area where everyone has its own opinion because
> > of various experiences. I was previously in favor of exceptions, but
> > maybe it's too much for such a low-level component as a standard or
> > special func
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I did the SVN update from E and the build from a Win7 command line.
>
> Does it still not work for you?
Yes, it still happens, very weird. Are you building on Win? Is this an
OS-specific E
Hi.
> > [...]
>
> I see that's another area where everyone has its own opinion because
> of various experiences. I was previously in favor of exceptions, but
> maybe it's too much for such a low-level component as a standard or
> special function. So I am now convinced that NaN should be returned
Hello,
and thanks for all this work! The new framework looks great... Can't
wait to find a use-case...
2012/8/24 Gilles Sadowski :
>> [...]
>>
>> I see three different solutions for this.
>>
>> 1) don't try to merge at all, and duplicate the Newton solver with the
>>new type.
>> 2) change the
> [...]
>
> I see three different solutions for this.
>
> 1) don't try to merge at all, and duplicate the Newton solver with the
>new type.
> 2) change the Newton solver to implement only the new interface (i.e.
>remove the "implements" statements for the former interfaces but
>let th
Hi all,
As explained in various messages on this list, I am introducing an
enhanced differentiation framework into [math]. The low level part lies
in the analysis.differentiation package.
This low level part has already been integrated with the basic
functions, together with the older framework.
Hi,
2012/8/24 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 24/08/2012 01:35, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:00:56PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 8/23/12 5:37 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 23/08/2012 13:37, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Sébastien
Le 24/08/2012 03:29, Becksfort, Jared a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Think about it from the standpoint of a new contributor. How
>>> long does it take to prepare and get a patch committed for a) the
>>> new contributor and b) the committer who ends up applying the
>>> patch. More rules means more t
Le 24/08/2012 01:35, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:00:56PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/23/12 5:37 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 23/08/2012 13:37, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
26 matches
Mail list logo
