MLOSS might be a good forum.
http://mloss.org/software/
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/11/12 3:22 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> > Luc,
> >
> > Yes, that should work for my company's needs. Thank you for clearing
> that up for me. I will plan to submit in the next f
On 7/11/12 3:22 PM, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> Luc,
>
> Yes, that should work for my company's needs. Thank you for clearing that up
> for me. I will plan to submit in the next few weeks.
>
> This should be my last legal question for awhile, but I also wanted to ask
> about submitting a note to
On 7/10/12 2:51 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question regarding [pool] -- which might turned out to be either a
> request for change or a potential improvement patch (though it could be the
> case I suppose that I've misunderstood certain things, in which case it will
> just turn
Luc,
Yes, that should work for my company's needs. Thank you for clearing that up
for me. I will plan to submit in the next few weeks.
This should be my last legal question for awhile, but I also wanted to ask
about submitting a note to a statistical journal. The method I have
implemented i
> [...]
>
> > My company is also generally
> > requires that I place our name somewhere near the top of the
> > comments. Does this work for you?
>
> The top header must be the Apache header, and we forbid use of the
> @author statement (authors change as the file is modified through bug
> fixes)
On 11/07/2012 18:34, Becksfort, Jared wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Jared,
>
> I have created 3 JIRA tickets for the code I plan to submit:
> Math-815, 816, and 817.
Thanks,
>
> My employer has given me permission to contribute the code. I am not
> an expert in the Apache license. I read
> http://www.ap
Hello,
I have created 3 JIRA tickets for the code I plan to submit: Math-815, 816,
and 817.
My employer has given me permission to contribute the code. I am not an expert
in the Apache license. I read http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt. It seems
that our company is still allowed to retai
Also, why is this better than, say, simply binding commons math into jruby?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >
> > I would like to submit you a new feature: an expression evaluator
> (MATH-809, ignore my patch). This interpreter wil
Hi.
>
> I would like to submit you a new feature: an expression evaluator (MATH-809,
> ignore my patch). This interpreter will evaluate an expression (including
> variable, function) but will don't provide parser (to keep I/O independency).
>
> I think it would be useful to put this functional
