On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb wrote:
>> Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
>> renamed to IMAGING.
>>
>> Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb wrote:
>> Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
>> renamed to IMAGING.
>>
>> Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4970
>
> Looks like it was our
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23575&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 27 Jun 2012 06:20:48 +
Finished at: Wed 27 Jun 2012 06:24:03 +
Total time: 3m 14s
Build Trigger: Schedule
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 27 June 2012 00:50, sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb wrote:
>> Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
>> renamed to IMAGING.
>>
>> Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4970
>
>
On 26 June 2012 22:50, sebb wrote:
> Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
> renamed to IMAGING.
>
> Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4970
Looks like it was our fault ... infra can fix th
Some new SANSELAN JIRAs have just been raised, however the JIRA was
renamed to IMAGING.
Looks like something is wrong with JIRA; I'll raise an Infra issue.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addition
I don't really have a problem with an ImmutableFileObject. It just seems you
could accomplish that through attributes and permissions. But having an
ImmutableFileObject that can wrap only FileObject would be OK.
Ralph
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at
On 6/25/12 11:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> +1 - drop it.
>
> I'd rather put the effort into the Javadoc.
My thoughts exactly. I will keep plugging away as I review the code.
Phil
> That is where my focus was when working on the updates for pool 2.0.
>
> I'd add that one of the things that drove m
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> OK - but why not just return errors if isWritable() is false?
>
Well, isWritable() will return true most of the time in this app. But I do
not want call sites of my class to have the option to modify the file.
Gary
> Ralph
>
> On Jun 26, 2
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski <
benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 17:36 , Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > After a brief glance, my first impression is that we should stick to
> > something more simple, like we have now on FileObject. We have
> > is
Hi,
On Jun 26, 2012, at 17:36 , Gary Gregory wrote:
> After a brief glance, my first impression is that we should stick to
> something more simple, like we have now on FileObject. We have
> isWritable(), so we could add setWritable().
>
> Adding a class hierarchy and more fancy permissions feels
After a brief glance, my first impression is that we should stick to
something more simple, like we have now on FileObject. We have
isWritable(), so we could add setWritable().
Adding a class hierarchy and more fancy permissions feels like it leaks
into Java 7-land.
I see two avenues:
- a simple
Hi,
I started to implement a file permission (or more generally a file properties)
framework for VFS. I attached a patch to VFS-405 issue (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-405 ) since it matches the bug
description.
The patch 0001 adds basic permission support in the form of a FilePr
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:57 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 04:59, wrote:
> > Author: psteitz
> > Date: Tue Jun 26 03:59:58 2012
> > New Revision: 1353809
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353809&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Updated javadoc links in preparation for 2.0 release.
> >
> >
On 26 June 2012 04:59, wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Tue Jun 26 03:59:58 2012
> New Revision: 1353809
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353809&view=rev
> Log:
> Updated javadoc links in preparation for 2.0 release.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/site/site.xml
>
> Mod
Hi Bene,
sounds a reasonable approach. Let's see where the experiment brings us! :)
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hey
Hey Simo,
thanks for the feedback. I hope that you could make your deadline ;-)
I'll implement that ASAP. Just one comment:
2012/6/25 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi Bene,
>
[SNIP]
>
> that is fine, but just throw the expected exception, no needs to throw
> an IllegalAccessException first.
>
To keep code
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
23 matches
Mail list logo
