To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Gilles,
>
> Exactly: If a user does not care about the callback, he shouldn't even have
> to look at the second constructor, even less wonder about the consequence of
> setting it to null.
>
Well, it could also be argued that default parameters are *evil* (I do
think they are), and that explici
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 6/24/12 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
>> On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 24 June 2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
> On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wro
On 6/24/12 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Nexus does not prevent any of this; it is a staging repo.
>> It does block what used to be a simple, controlled process
>>
>> 0) generate, test and sign artifacts locally
>> 1) u
On 24/06/2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Nexus does not prevent any of this; it is a staging repo.
>
> It does block what used to be a simple, controlled process
>
> 0) generate, test and sign artifacts locally
> 1) upload to p.a.o
> 2) vote
> 3) move to relea
On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>> Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
>>> On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas
On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
>> On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wro
On 24 June 2012 15:12, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
>
>> On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 17/06
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like only the relatively trivial POOL-220 and POOL
On 24 June 2012 13:42, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
>>> to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few
>>>
On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the sour
Are we going through that Java 5 vs Java 6 discussion again? ;)
Thomas: I always wanted to work on collections but there hasn't been much
activity since I joined the ML. I'd be happy to contribute some patches.
Benedikt
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 24.06.2012 um 14:10 schrieb Gary Gregory :
I am +1 to all your proposed changes.
Gary
On Jun 24, 2012, at 5:29, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
> to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
>
> - there is still lots of javadoc missi
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
> to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
>
> - there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level
> to Java 1.6
Hi,
I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk
to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:
- there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level
to Java 1.6 would allow the use of @Override in more places (instead
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
23 matches
Mail list logo
