To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
As general note, releasing is hard, error prone and cumbersome. I just
don't know what to do about it. The whole 'site in SVN' thing is
interesting. Maybe it's a direction worth pursuing for more than just
the site, not sure.
Gary
On Jun 23, 2012, at 21:05, sebb wrote:
> On 23 June 2012 23:00,
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Looks like only the relatively trivial POOL-220 and POOL-217 affect
> 2.0.
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like only the relatively trivial POOL-220 and POOL-217 affect
2.0.
>>> +1
>>>
We need to resolve these and do
Hi Sébastien.
> >> Author: celestin
> >> Date: Sat Jun 23 15:09:14 2012
> >> New Revision: 1353140
> >
> > Either I don't understand this change, or I don't agree with it.
> >
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353140&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> In o.a.c.m3.Incrementor, modified construc
Hi Gilles,
2012/6/23 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hello.
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:09:15PM -, celes...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: celestin
>> Date: Sat Jun 23 15:09:14 2012
>> New Revision: 1353140
>
> Either I don't understand this change, or I don't agree with it.
>
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apac
Hello.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:09:15PM -, celes...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: celestin
> Date: Sat Jun 23 15:09:14 2012
> New Revision: 1353140
Either I don't understand this change, or I don't agree with it.
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1353140&view=rev
> Log:
> In o.a.c.m
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
12 matches
Mail list logo
