To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi,
I'm still working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-423
and I wanted to test if all the new exception get thrown correctly.
For that reason I implemented a new class - ExceptionThrowingTestBean
that properties and methods that throw exceptions when they get
called. That way I ca
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11, wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
New Revision: 1351831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351831&view=rev
Log:
Created tag for Configuration 1.8 release.
Added:
commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATIO
On 06/20/2012 12:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 22:05, wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Tue Jun 19 21:05:48 2012
>> New Revision: 1351852
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351852&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [COLLECTIONS-399] Added get(index) method to BoundedFifoBuffer.
>>
>> Modified:
>>
Le 19/06/2012 20:50, sebb a écrit :
> Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
>
> Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
> a new tag without the RCn suffix.
>
> For example, if the successful release vote was based on
>
> common
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23366&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 20 Jun 2012 13:20:08 +
Finished at: Wed 20 Jun 2012 13:21:01 +
Total time: 53s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Hi James,
I think that analyzed cases by Benedikt still sound good, adding
'semantic' for each defined exception.
I wouldn't expect users will be forced on try/catch blocks... anyway I
suggest to start with Bene's codebase and refine it while working on
BU2, depending of how the component evolves
> Now I'm thinking
> that it might be a better approach to handle exception where they
> first appeared. For example we could catch the NoSuchMethodException
> in DefaultBeanProperties. That would scatter the exception handling
> everywhere around in the code, but it would reduce the overhead in
>
I thought folks agreed to stick with one generic exception and only add
when it makes sense. Does this really make sense? That is a rather large
hierarchy. Are people really going to put catch blocks for any of those
specific exceptions?
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevit
Hello,
is there any roadmap or planned release date for Jexl 3?
Regards,
Tomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> However, as already mentioned on the respository mailing list, the
> .asc has been restored to the staging directory, so it should now be
> possible to release the full set of files.
I saw the mail from infra, but he mentioned the checksum is not
correct or something like that. Or am I wrong? we
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 16:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
18 matches
Mail list logo
