2012/6/19 Simone Tripodi :
>> The point is with "Property %s not found in %s type" you're embedding the
>> relevant data in the message text and a client would have to parse the text
>> if a special handling is required.
>
> I would never force poor users parsing the exception message to
> understa
2012/6/18 Simone Tripodi :
> +1 to 'of'
>
> short to type and intuitive!
>
> Thanks Matt for the valuable feedbacks!
>
I'll implement that after I'm finished with replacing the exceptions.
Benedikt
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.co
2012/6/19 Simone Tripodi :
> Hello,
>
>> I remember, that we added the internal package, because we had the
>> need to split up the code base. Looking at the code base now, I don't
>> see any reason for the internal package. Can we move Assertions back
>> to the main package and remove the internal
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 17 June 2012 05:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 June 2012 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > It's official: The Maven-Nexus is a pain in my you-know-what.
>> >
>> > All of the extra files (SHA, MD5, -bin, -src) must be deleted manually,
>> and
>>
On Jun 19, 2012, at 18:15, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 20:55, Dan Tran wrote:
>> running single test with 2.12 is broken on Windows , and no fix
>> available either.
>>
>> Dont have the JIRA number with me thou.
>
> AFAIK, broken for all OSes:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-827
On Jun 19, 2012, at 16:14, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 19.06.2012 20:50, schrieb sebb:
>> Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
>>
>> Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
>> a new tag without the RCn suffix.
>>
>> For example, i
On 19 June 2012 22:05, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Tue Jun 19 21:05:48 2012
> New Revision: 1351852
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351852&view=rev
> Log:
> [COLLECTIONS-399] Added get(index) method to BoundedFifoBuffer.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/collections/trunk/src/main/j
On 19 June 2012 21:11, wrote:
> Author: oheger
> Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
> New Revision: 1351831
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351831&view=rev
> Log:
> Created tag for Configuration 1.8 release.
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8/ (props chan
On 19 June 2012 20:55, Dan Tran wrote:
> running single test with 2.12 is broken on Windows , and no fix
> available either.
>
> Dont have the JIRA number with me thou.
AFAIK, broken for all OSes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-827
> -Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Gary
On 19 June 2012 20:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
>>
>> Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
>> a new tag without the RCn suffix.
>>
>> For ex
On 19 June 2012 17:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 19 June 2012 16:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Ga
Am 19.06.2012 20:50, schrieb sebb:
Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
a new tag without the RCn suffix.
For example, if the successful release vote was based on
commons-xyz-1.6_RC3
running single test with 2.12 is broken on Windows , and no fix
available either.
Dont have the JIRA number with me thou.
-Dan
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> What? The surefire plugin no longer supports runnin
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> What? The surefire plugin no longer supports running individual tests?
> That can't be right.
>
It's not right but it is so :( At least with JUnit.
Gary
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: ggr
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:50 PM, sebb wrote:
> Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
>
> Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
> a new tag without the RCn suffix.
>
> For example, if the successful release vote was based on
>
Yep, thanks Sebb, I'm still caught up in the Maven/Nexus mess...
Gary
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:41 PM, sebb wrote:
> There were a lot of spurious files under the IO dist directory tree,
> for example:
>
> commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.1
> commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.asc.sha1.1commons-io-2.4-bin.
Version 2.3 does not appear in the downloads list.
I assume that is because it requires Java 1.6+, and so is superseded by 2.4.
In which case, it needs to be removed from the dist/ directories.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu
What? The surefire plugin no longer supports running individual tests? That
can't be right.
Ralph
On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Tue Jun 19 16:18:32 2012
> New Revision: 1351765
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351765&view=rev
> Log
Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
a new tag without the RCn suffix.
For example, if the successful release vote was based on
commons-xyz-1.6_RC3
then the RM should copy that to creat
On 19 June 2012 17:18, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Tue Jun 19 16:18:32 2012
> New Revision: 1351765
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351765&view=rev
> Log:
> Add commented out section for running individual tests.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/vfs/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: c
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:25 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 16:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at
There were a lot of spurious files under the IO dist directory tree,
for example:
commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.1
commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.asc.sha1.1commons-io-2.4-bin.zip.1
commons-io-2.4-bin.zip.asc.sha1.1
commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.asc.1
commons-io-2.4-bin.tar.gz.md5.1 commons-
On 19 June 2012 16:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Tue
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Comm
On 19 June 2012 13:05, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>> > Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am wo
> The point is with "Property %s not found in %s type" you're embedding the
> relevant data in the message text and a client would have to parse the text
> if a special handling is required.
I would never force poor users parsing the exception message to
understand what is wrong - I would add gett
Hi Simo,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> A suggestion:
>
> we are often using the String.format() method to format Exception
> messages - which is very good, IMHO - and since we are introducing a
> new Exception we can take advantage for reducing its use, centralizing
> the messag
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
A suggestion:
we are often using the String.format() method to format Exception
messages - which is very good, IMHO - and since we are introducing a
new Exception we can take advantage for reducing its use, centralizing
the message format in the new exception itself, h
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it...
>>
>> Any problems, you could use help with?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it...
>
> Any problems, you could use help with?
>
Well, yes, all the help I can get! I asked for help on repos
Hello,
> I remember, that we added the internal package, because we had the
> need to split up the code base. Looking at the code base now, I don't
> see any reason for the internal package. Can we move Assertions back
> to the main package and remove the internal package?
yes, I am taking care o
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it...
Any problems, you could use help with?
--
In other words: what could be seen as a socially debilitating failure
of character can certainly work to your advantage too.
Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it...
Gary
On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:40, rupert thurner wrote:
> hi,
>
> what is the best strategy to include a commons library into a build? usually
> we
> refer to some artifact repository, like http://search.maven.org. but it s
What build tool are you using? Maven at least, should find commons-io
anyways. If any public commons-io release is not in the public Maven
repository, then file a bug report against commons-io: That's got to
be fixed.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:33 PM, rupert thurner
wrote:
> hi,
>
> what is the
hi,
what is the best strategy to include a commons library into a build? usually we
refer to some artifact repository, like http://search.maven.org. but it seems
the newest apache commons libraries, like commons-io-2.4.jar are not there?
best regards,
rupert
--
Hi Bill,
>
> And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
> dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
> e.g.:
> RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
> RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
> a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
>
Hi Bill,
2012/6/19 Bill Barker :
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Luc Maisonobe
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
>
>
>> Hi Sébastien,
>>
>> Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
And, it is much worse than that. Pretty much nobody cares about ebe, but
dotProduct and outerProduct also assume that 0*NaN = 0 and 0*+-Infinity = 0.
e.g.:
RealVector a = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
RealVector b = new OpenMapRealVector(10);
a.setEntry(1, 1.0);
b.setEntry(2, Doubl
-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector
Hi Sébastien,
Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
Dear all,
in this thread,
http://markmail.or
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Simo,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
[snip]
>>> A suggestion:
>>>
>>> we are often using the String.format() method to format Exception
>>> messages - which is very good, IMHO - and since we are introducing a
>>> new Exception we can take advantage for reducing its use, centralizing
>>> the message fo
49 matches
Mail list logo
