[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jxpath (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [BeanUtils2] Some proposals for an exception name

Hi, I've started to implement BeanReflectionException and I want to take the approach Simone suggested with the ErrorMessage from Digester. Now I have a problem: If I want to pass the throwable cause as well, that parameter has to be before the varargs argument. This would result in the following

[BeanUtils2] Do we still need the internal and the transformers package?

Hi, I remember, that we added the internal package, because we had the need to split up the code base. Looking at the code base now, I don't see any reason for the internal package. Can we move Assertions back to the main package and remove the internal package? And what do we need the transformer

Re: [BeanUtils2] Thoughts about the API

+1 to 'of' short to type and intuitive! Thanks Matt for the valuable feedbacks! best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ ---

Re: [BeanUtils2] Thoughts about the API

Just for the sake of multiple choice, what about: - keyedBy - keyedTo - withKey - of - at ? Matt On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > LOL indeed :) > > go for your proposed solution, sounds nice anyway :) > > alles gute, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: [BeanUtils2] Thoughts about the API

LOL indeed :) go for your proposed solution, sounds nice anyway :) alles gute, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I just realize

Re: [BeanUtils2] Some proposals for an exception name

Sounds even better! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:33 PM, James Carman wrote: > BeanReflectionException? > > Sent from tablet device.  Please excuse typos and

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

+1 to Christian! OGNL have been here for a long time without be released... let's work towards a release!!! best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Christ

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Łukasz Lenart wrote: > Finally, the old issues from OpenSymphony were imported :-) You are a true hero and i am impressed by your patience! Thank you so much for following this issue for so long time. I would have done a simple copy, but your solution is much be

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

Finally, the old issues from OpenSymphony were imported :-) Kind regards -- Łukasz mobile +48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [BeanUtils2] Some proposals for an exception name

BeanReflectionException? Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity. On Jun 18, 2012 4:30 AM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote: > Guten morgen, Bene, > > > My personal favorite is ReflectionException. I don't think, that we > > should prefix classes wie BeanUtils*, because this information

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Math - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23308&projectId=97 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Mon 18 Jun 2012 10:20:48 + Finished at: Mon 18 Jun 2012 10:24:06 + Total time: 3m 17s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: [BeanUtils2] Thoughts about the API

I just realized, that we cannot call a method MappedPropertyAccessor.for(String key) - "for" is a reserved keyword ;-) How about: MappedPropertyAcessor.forKey(String key) and ArgumentsAcessor.with(Argument... Arguments) Benedikt 2012/6/16 Simone Tripodi : > +1 to James for both topics, > > let's

Re: [math] Problems with sparse implementations of RealVector

Hi Sébastien, Le 18/06/2012 08:11, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Dear all, > > in this thread, > http://markmail.org/thread/hhvm6wv3d3uhkwqs > we had an interesting discussion on a bug which was revealed by > abstract unit tests on all implementations of RealVector. It turns out > that the bug is

Re: [BeanUtils2] Some proposals for an exception name

Guten morgen, Bene, > My personal favorite is ReflectionException. I don't think, that we > should prefix classes wie BeanUtils*, because this information is > contained in the fully qualified class name. +1 I wouldn't happy at all to add a BeanUtilsException, ReflectionException sounds the good

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration. T

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Apache Commons Digester - Build using Java 1.6

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23305&projectId=75 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Mon 18 Jun 2012 08:20:08 + Finished at: Mon 18 Jun 2012 08:21:03 + Total time: 54s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This