Re: [ALL]Can you share the codeformater.xml and codetemplates.xml in eclipse

2012-05-31 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Since configurations may change over time it would be better to put them in SVN. Benedikt 2012/5/31 sebb : > On 31 May 2012 22:13, Gary Gregory wrote: >> We need to put this or some commons wide convention in SVN... where? How >> about commons-parent? ide/eclipse/? > > Or stick it on the Wiki. >

Re: [jcs] Request for review

2012-05-31 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
 Hi,  [jcs] seems very interesting :-) and maybe I could use it in some applications too (or at least knowing about it may help). I'm not an expert in generics, but some time ago similar task was done in [functor], maybe we could use that as base. I will read the changes in [functor] and will

RE: [Jenkins] commons-vfs-trunk killed and temporarily reconfigured

2012-05-31 Thread Gavin McDonald
> -Original Message- > From: Kristian Waagan [mailto:kristian.waa...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 1:20 AM > To: bui...@apache.org > Cc: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: [Jenkins] commons-vfs-trunk killed and temporarily reconfigured > > Hi, > > commons-vfs-trunk [1] had be

Re: [classscan] Source repository

2012-05-31 Thread Honton, Charles
The classscan sandbox is open for play! http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/classscan/trunk/ Chas On 5/31/12 9:53 AM, "Matt Benson" wrote: >Hello all, > As Charles has been recently voted in as a Commons committer by >virtue of his other contributions to Commons components >(congrat

Re: [ALL]Can you share the codeformater.xml and codetemplates.xml in eclipse

2012-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31 May 2012 22:13, Gary Gregory wrote: > We need to put this or some commons wide convention in SVN... where? How > about commons-parent? ide/eclipse/? Or stick it on the Wiki. > Gary > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Le 17/05/2012 04:47, Love Yao a écrit : >> >

[scxml] why in all test case there is instead of

2012-05-31 Thread Alessandro Scarozza
the question is simple: in w3c standard the final state is: but in all test case there is: it also seems that by the final attribute does not work, while using the tag final works fine long story short: commons scxml are according to W3C test case are wrong Is that so? -- Alessandro Scaro

Re: [ALL]Can you share the codeformater.xml and codetemplates.xml in eclipse

2012-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
some (very few) components use the Maven style: http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Love Yao wrote

Re: [classscan] Source repository

2012-05-31 Thread Mark Struberg
yes, keep it rolling! We will try to use it in OWB and then we will merge the best ideas of xbean-finder, Charles stuff, etc all together if they fit. This is a complicated topic and we will need to do lots of performance testing in any case. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > F

Re: [classscan] Source repository

2012-05-31 Thread Matt Benson
Hello all, As Charles has been recently voted in as a Commons committer by virtue of his other contributions to Commons components (congratulations!), he is now free to import his work into the [classscan] sandbox repo as a base for the rest of us to start stuffing features. ;P Regarding IP: I

Re: [jcs] Request for review

2012-05-31 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 31.05.12 03:09, sebb wrote: > DoubleLinkedList looks incomplete. > It is parameterised by the node type (which must extend > DoubleLinkedListNode), but the node content type is not specified. > > Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix this as I am no generics expert either. Yeah, I failed on t

Re: [scxml] Anybody active?

2012-05-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Kukosa, Tomas wrote: > > What are rules for the trunk and the J6 branch? > > May I develop against the J6 branch or should it contain just differences for > Java 1.6 and all development should be against the trunk? > J6 is the 1.x development line (unreleased, f

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-05-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-05-31 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [math] LocalizedFormats.ALPHA and BETA no longer used

2012-05-31 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 31/05/2012 08:23, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hi, > > 2012/5/27 Sébastien Brisard : >> Hi, >> >> 2012/5/27 Luc Maisonobe : >>> Le 27/05/2012 16:25, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 24/05/2012 21:27, Sébastien Brisard a écrit

Re: [math] Duplicate code in ArrayRealVectorTest, RealVectorTest, SparseRealVectorTest

2012-05-31 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 31/05/2012 07:56, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hello, > assuming that no answer meant no (strong) opposition, I took the > liberty to create MATH-795 [1]. This refactoring has already revealed > a problem (see r1344570 and r1344571). Fine, thanks Luc > > Best regards, > > Sébastien > > [1

RE: [scxml] Anybody active?

2012-05-31 Thread Kukosa, Tomas
What are rules for the trunk and the J6 branch? May I develop against the J6 branch or should it contain just differences for Java 1.6 and all development should be against the trunk? Tomas -Original Message- From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akol...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17