[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-05-09 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Math - Default Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

2012-05-09 Thread Continuum@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21966&projectId=97 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 9 May 2012 12:20:44 + Finished at: Wed 9 May 2012 12:24:30 + Total time: 3m 45s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:03:58AM -0400, James Carman wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Is there such a thing as short-term serialization? > > > > Yes, of course, and this what many people need. This is what James > > called marshalling/unmarshalling. This is a st

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi James, 2012/5/9 James Carman : > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Sébastien Brisard > wrote: >> Setting aside the discussion on serialization, this would probably be >> a nice extension. The problem is to find a good (as in "widely used") >> standard. Do you think the file formats used by R are

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread James Carman
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Setting aside the discussion on serialization, this would probably be > a nice extension. The problem is to find a good (as in "widely used") > standard. Do you think the file formats used by R are good candidates > (meaning: used outside

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi James, 2012/5/9 James Carman : > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Is there such a thing as short-term serialization? >> >> Yes, of course, and this what many people need. This is what James >> called marshalling/unmarshalling. This is a standard way to communicate >> be

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread James Carman
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Is there such a thing as short-term serialization? > > Yes, of course, and this what many people need. This is what James > called marshalling/unmarshalling. This is a standard way to communicate > between some applications that share a commo

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Sébastien Brisard
2012/5/9 Gilles Sadowski : >> >> the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the >> >> MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! >> >> >> > >> > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the >> > already existing lanczos function, and create an additional

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> >> the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the > >> MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! > >> > > > > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the > > already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for > > the constant. >

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Sébastien Brisard
OK, I've cleaned up my mess, and attached the true patch to MATH-753. Sorry about that. Sébastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > > the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the > > MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! > > > > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the > already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for > the constant. > I

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Thomas, > >> Hi, >> the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the >> MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! >> > > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the > already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for > the const

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

2012-05-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the > MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! > What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the already existing lanczos function, and create an

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration. T

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-05-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

2012-05-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Gilles, Le 08/05/2012 23:05, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:55:47PM -0400, James Carman wrote: >> I don't know that you want to get into supporting long-term >> serialization support. I would say CM should support transient >> serialization (if that makes any sense), su