Hi,
Kurt has recently proposed a patch for 1D-FFT which is much faster
than our current impl, while still passing the tests (of course).
Am I likely to hurt anyone's feelings if I replace the old impl by the new impl?
Also, I think that one of the reasons why our previous implementation
was so slo
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
anyway, just for the record: the reason is just because I introduced a
new package that needs to access to same methods, otherwise there
wouldn't have been any reason to expose it.
do you see a valid motivation?
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
h
done, Eclipse missed somehow to commit it
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> +1 for that! it was getting pretty packed in the main packag
On 6 February 2012 17:45, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 05:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't, but since its there, so
+1 for that! it was getting pretty packed in the main package ;-) Please
have a look at AssertionsTest as well (imports have to be changed).
Regards,
Benedikt
Am 06.02.2012 20:41, schrieb simonetrip...@apache.org:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Mon Feb 6 19:41:07 2012
New Revision: 1241124
URL:
On 02/06/2012 05:16 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turkwrote:
I don't, but since its there, so be it.
OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current
behaviour should b
On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't, but since its there, so be it.
>>>
>>
>> OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current
>> behaviour should be fixed and docu
On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
I don't, but since its there, so be it.
OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current
behaviour should be fixed and documented or just documented.
You mean with DAEMON-240? Resolved just ab
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 04:15 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
>
> Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time.
> We don't have to wait for a release
On 02/06/2012 04:15 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote:
Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time.
We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site.
That particular JIRA could involve code chang
On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time.
>>> We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site.
>>
>>
>> That particular JIRA could involve code changes as well.
>> Als
On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote:
Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time.
We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site.
That particular JIRA could involve code changes as well.
Also, we include the site source in the archive.
Right, this is probabl
On 6 February 2012 14:43, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 12:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Is there anything else we should consider before doing that?
>>
>>
>> I've just raised DAEMO
On 5 February 2012 16:22, wrote:
> Author: damjan
> Date: Sun Feb 5 16:22:25 2012
> New Revision: 1240761
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1240761&view=rev
> Log:
> Hid formats.jpeg.JpegImageParser.AcceptedExtensions
> and converted icc classes to enums.
>
> Jira issue key: SANSELAN-42
On 02/06/2012 12:48 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Is there anything else we should consider before doing that?
I've just raised DAEMON-240; it would be good if the docs could be
updated accordingly.
Sure, but the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there anything else we should consider before doing that?
I've just raised DAEMON-240; it would be good if the docs could be
updated accordingly.
Also, is it possible to resolve DAEMON-234 easil
On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Is there anything else we should consider before doing that?
Please note that the sources are inside branches/1.0.x not trunk!
(Just in case someone forgot that we are going to release 1.0.x
versions from 1.0.x branch from now on)
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 06/02/2012 08:30, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are few important bug fixes for 1.0.8 so I plan to push
> for a 1.0.9 bugfix release later this week.
Excellent. I'll hold off on a Tomcat 7.0.x release until this is available.
Cheers,
Mark
---
Hi,
There are few important bug fixes for 1.0.8 so I plan to push
for a 1.0.9 bugfix release later this week.
Is there anything else we should consider before doing that?
sebb, you always have something to say at vote time, so here is
the chance to do that before ;)
Regards
--
^TM
---
22 matches
Mail list logo
