To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
The Apache Commons PMC is pleased to announce the Apache Commons
Validator-1.4.0 release!
The Apache Commons Validator component provides the building blocks
for both client side validation and server side data validation.
Changes in this version include:
New features:
o New generic CodeValidato
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:33:44PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on the exceptions in the stat.inference package and
> have seen that all classes in this package follow the same scheme:
>
> - Interface for a statistical test
> - Implementation of this single interf
Hi,
I have been working on the exceptions in the stat.inference package and
have seen that all classes in this package follow the same scheme:
- Interface for a statistical test
- Implementation of this single interface
e.g.
ChiSquareTest
ChiSquareTestImpl
There was some effort in other pack
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=18236&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 3 Feb 2012 18:21:26 +
Finished at: Fri 3 Feb 2012 18:22:39 +
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
There is also the project renaming/repackaging to [imaging] that needs to
be done before 1.0.
See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/126548
Gary
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Shashank Gupta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Shashank Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
> We have been using sanselan incubator 0.97 release which has performance
> issues on .tif format. I hope that the next 1.0 release version contains
> fixes around performance. When this big-bang release is scheduled?
>
> Also I checke
Hi,
We have been using sanselan incubator 0.97 release which has performance issues
on .tif format. I hope that the next 1.0 release version contains fixes around
performance. When this big-bang release is scheduled?
Also I checked the trunk source code and it seems that performance
fixes(SANSE
Hi.
> >
> > The failure is unrelated to the commit, but has to do with this issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-588
> >
> > I don't know whether the test tolerance is too stringent or there really is
> > a bug. Could someone have a look?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have looked into this
On 02/02/2012 11:57 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:40:14AM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
>
> The failure is unrelated to the commit, but has to do with this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-588
>
> I don't know whether the test tolerance is too stri
I completely agree with Simone. I see [graph] as the right place not
only for well-known algorithms but also for state-of-the-art results,
where graphs are either "support structures" for computation or actual
"main data structures" fitting the user domain.
P.S.: with this I am not saying th
Hello,
On 01/02/2012 17:39, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Gary!!! :)
I don't see any issue on adding the BST algorithms you need in
[graph], even if you have to reuse the minimum amount of codebase,
packages don't usually interact each other very much, unless some
DFS/BFS or shortest path is needed
Sorry, I miss-clicked... wanted to send that mail to your e-mail address
directly since the mailing list rejects attachments...
For what ever reason "answer to sender" has the same effect as "anwser
to list" in Thunderbird.
I'll send it again to your address :-)
Regards,
Benedikt
Am 03.02.2012
Am 03.02.2012 08:14, schrieb Sébastien Brisard:
Hi,
as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is
in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta
function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are
large-ish. I think this is a very interesting
Hi Luc,
>
> Hi Sébastien,
>
>> as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is
>> in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta
>> function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are
>> large-ish. I think this is a very interesting issue, but al
Le 03/02/2012 08:14, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi Sébastien,
> as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is
> in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta
> function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are
> large-ish. I think t
16 matches
Mail list logo
