Hi all guys,
more than 72h have passed and I consider the [VOTE] closed and passes
with the following resolution:
five +1 binding votes from PMCs:
* Oliver Heger
* Nick Burch
* Simone Tripodi
* Luc Maisonobe
* Jörg Schaible
one -0 vote from
* Gary Gregory
I am going to proceed on promot
Hi,
as rightly pointed out by Christian, the bug reported in MATH-718 is
in fact a result of the current implementation of the incomplete beta
function I(x, a, b), which is inaccurate when a and/or b are
large-ish. I think this is a very interesting issue, but also one
which will not be solved in o
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 1 February 2012 14:06, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Wed Feb 1 14:06:09 2012
> New Revision: 1239134
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239134&view=rev
> Log:
> Trunk is 1.1.x. Or even better it should be 2.x cause I plan to break
> everything :)
+1 to changing the version to 2.0-S
Hi Adam,
thanks for using the Digester :)
For what I can see, the rule specifies
.ofTypeSpecifiedByAttribute( "typeName" )
when the xml is
according to this snippet, the rule should be
.ofTypeSpecifiedByAttribute( "type" )
Can you have a look at it? Please let me know!
TIA,
-Sim
Hi,
tonight I have spent 5 hours working over one bug in my app.
Unfortunately I digged to some place of code where I think I found a
bug in Digester
It is in: org.apache.commons.digester3.ObjectCreateRule
I think this part of code:
@Override
public void begin( String namespace, String name
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:40:14AM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
The failure is unrelated to the commit, but has to do with this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-588
I don't know whether the test tolerance is too stringent or there really is
a bug. Could someone have a look?
