Re: [SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Thoughts about AccessibleObjectsRegistry

2012-01-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Benedikt, thanks for investing your spare time on contributing on BeanUtils2! Please read my inline comments: > Complex methods: I know, that BeanUtils2 is just an experiment, and that the > code was written to get it working fast for this purpose. But some methods > are really hard to read. Ta

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-27 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-27 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-27 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: [IO] release 2.2?

2012-01-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I committed a small refactoring. Please comment and/or continue refactoring. Looks good to me, thanks for doing this. Niall > Thank you, > Gary > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 23 January 2012 15:27, Gary Gregory

[VOTE] Release Configuration 1.8 based on RC1

2012-01-27 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way. Tag: https://sv

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-27 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Luc, thanks for this answer. >> >> My problem is that I do not know what getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy() >> should return. I see three options >> 1. Have getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy() throw an >> UnsupportedOperationException, as the solver is *never* invoked. >> 2. Return a default value, and specify

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-27 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 27/01/2012 13:55, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hi >> >> It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. >> Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that >> prevent the preparation of the release? >> > > MATH-731 is pretty much solved, but I still need a

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-27 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 27/01/2012 12:48, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > Hi. Hi Gilles, > > > It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. > Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that > prevent the preparation of the release? > MATH-621 (s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 based on RC1

2012-01-27 Thread Nick Burch
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Simone Tripodi wrote: as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the [validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details: Artifacts look good to me, I'm +1 Nick ---

[SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Thoughts about AccessibleObjectsRegistry

2012-01-27 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, now, that I have made myself more familiar with BeanUtils2, there are a few things worth discussing regarding AccessibleObjectsRegistry. Complex methods: I know, that BeanUtils2 is just an experiment, and that the code was written to get it working fast for this purpose. But some methods

Bug in "RandomDataTest" ?

2012-01-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. (1) I suspect there might be a bug at line 207 in file "RandomDataTest.java" (package "o.a.c.m.random"), indicate by "HERE" in the excerpt below: ---CUT--- private void checkNextLongUniform(int min, int max) throws Exception { final Frequency freq = new Frequency(); for (in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 based on RC1

2012-01-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ Hi Seb, >>     >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC1/ > > That tag is not unique, as it was recreated. > So please

Re: [jxpath] Converter Lookup within BasicTypeConverter

2012-01-27 Thread Matt Benson
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:37 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I stumbled over the BasicTypeConverter > (org.apache.commons.jxpath.util.BasicTypeConverter.java) > > Within this class the BeanUtils ConvertUtils class is used for looking up > a matching converter. This is done by only supplying the target class

[jxpath] Converter Lookup within BasicTypeConverter

2012-01-27 Thread stefan . albrecht
Hi, I stumbled over the BasicTypeConverter (org.apache.commons.jxpath.util.BasicTypeConverter.java) Within this class the BeanUtils ConvertUtils class is used for looking up a matching converter. This is done by only supplying the target class. I think it is worthwhile to either change this to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 based on RC1

2012-01-27 Thread sebb
On 27 January 2012 09:49, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Good morning all mates :) > > as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the > [validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons > validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details: > > Tag: > >     > https://svn.apac

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-27 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi > > It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. > Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that > prevent the preparation of the release? > MATH-731 is pretty much solved, but I still need a piece of advice. Let me explain : the triangular distributio

Re: [Graph] Graph connectivity algo

2012-01-27 Thread Claudio Squarcella
On 27/01/2012 12:47, Claudio Squarcella wrote: Hello, On 27/01/2012 12:35, Marco Speranza wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement the Boruvka's algorithm and I need to know is a grah is connected or not. So I'd like to propose a simple algorithm to do that. A simple way to implement that is r

Re: [Math] Toward releasing 3.0 ?

2012-01-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > >>> > >>> It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues. > >>> Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that > >>> prevent the preparation of the release? > >>> > >> > >> > >> MATH-621 (see also MATH-728) > >> * Unit test coverage: at least 6 branche

Re: [Graph] Graph connectivity algo

2012-01-27 Thread Claudio Squarcella
Hello, On 27/01/2012 12:35, Marco Speranza wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement the Boruvka's algorithm and I need to know is a grah is connected or not. So I'd like to propose a simple algorithm to do that. A simple way to implement that is run a depth-first or breadth-first search starting

Re: [Graph] Graph connectivity algo

2012-01-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Marco! go for it!!! Just fill an issue and provide a patch ;) thanks for your effort, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Marco Speranza wrote: > Hi a

[Graph] Graph connectivity algo

2012-01-27 Thread Marco Speranza
Hi all, I'm trying to implement the Boruvka's algorithm and I need to know is a grah is connected or not. So I'd like to propose a simple algorithm to do that. A simple way to implement that is run a depth-first or breadth-first search starting from an arbitrary vertex. If the number of the vertic

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 based on RC1

2012-01-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
Good morning all mates :) as promised time ago, I finally found the slot to rollout the [validator] RC and I am here today to open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator 1.4.0 based on RC1. Follow details: Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC