Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=16588&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 05:40:12 +
Finished at: Sat 31 Dec 2011 05:43:49 +
Total time: 3m 36s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 30 décembre 2011 23:30, Daniel Shahaf a écrit :
> Sébastien Brisard wrote on Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 16:24:38 +0100:
>> Hi,
>> sorry for the delay. I have carried out a few more experiments (see below).
>> Sébastien
>>
>> >> >> Should I move to svn 1.7 ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > You could try movi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-net-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
> > - Server. Does the error reproduce if you check out your working copy
> > from svn-master.apache.org? (If you literally check out from
> > https://svn-master.apache.org/repos/asf/... you'll get SSL warnings;
> > you can either bypass them or set
> > # 140.211.11.4 svn.apache.org
>
Sébastien Brisard wrote on Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 16:24:38 +0100:
> Hi,
> sorry for the delay. I have carried out a few more experiments (see below).
> Sébastien
>
> >> >> Should I move to svn 1.7 ?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > You could try moving to 1.7, and/or using the official JavaHL bindings
> >> > i
+1
* tag build works fine;
* binary signatures are OK;
* site is updated with snippets including generics;
* clirr doesn't show any single backward compatibility error;
* changes report contains 1.6 release;
* checkstyle is OK.
trivial notes:
* RAT reports 3 Unapproved licenses but t
Hi,
sorry for the delay. I have carried out a few more experiments (see below).
Sébastien
>> >> Should I move to svn 1.7 ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > You could try moving to 1.7, and/or using the official JavaHL bindings
>> > instead of the third-party SVNKit implementation. With my svn hat on,
>> > though,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
11 matches
Mail list logo