On 12/19/11 12:52 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/19/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 18/12/2011 23:10, James Carman a écrit :
My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
we have to demote it
On 12/19/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 18/12/2011 23:10, James Carman a écrit :
>>> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
>>> we have to demote it later.
>> I don't see any problem with this. F
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 18/12/2011 23:10, James Carman a écrit :
>> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
>> we have to demote it later.
>
> I don't see any problem with this. For now the component seems to have a
> community
sure it makes sense, once broken, break as needed
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> +1
> and if we're breaking binary compatibil
On 12/17/11 7:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Another slightly odd looking thing is to have
> org.apache.commons.sanselan.common as a package. There is also a util
> packages. I wonder I this stuff can be moved around in some way that
> looks and feels less scattered.
>
> Op Ed:
> On a different tak,
Le 19/12/2011 07:16, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:10 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper
>> and then we have to demote it later. I am interested, but I don't
>> know how much hands-on time I'll have for it
Le 18/12/2011 23:10, James Carman a écrit :
> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
> we have to demote it later.
I don't see any problem with this. For now the component seems to have a
community, hence it is worht promoting it (this is a +1 from me). If
late
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:10 PM, James Carman wrote:
> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
> we have to demote it later. I am interested, but I don't know how much
> hands-on time I'll have for it. If we get it to a mature state and let it
> prove itself
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then
we have to demote it later. I am interested, but I don't know how much
hands-on time I'll have for it. If we get it to a mature state and let it
prove itself a bit first, I think it has a better chance. That's just my
op
+1
Siegfried Goeschl
On 18.12.11 21:12, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all,
Since I proposed[1] to resurrect commons-graph from dormant to
sandbox, there's been not only my personal activity, but we have
recorded a good number of discussions on the ML and received
contributions on JIRA[2], involving
+1 :)
Gary
On Dec 18, 2011, at 15:13, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since I proposed[1] to resurrect commons-graph from dormant to
> sandbox, there's been not only my personal activity, but we have
> recorded a good number of discussions on the ML and received
> contributions on JIRA[2], in
+1 go proper
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Am 18.12.2011 21:22, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
>> can't we prepare the release in proper? Maybe it would be easier
>> attracting more people interested on contributing and get it ready for
>> a release quicker...
>
> I agree. If i
Am 18.12.2011 21:22, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi James!
can't we prepare the release in proper? Maybe it would be easier
attracting more people interested on contributing and get it ready for
a release quicker...
I agree. If it is in proper, there is a good chance that it gains more
attention.
Hi Hasan,
I don't have a generic order for keys, my order is the same of the fields
in select list:
select , , ..., from ...
when the resultset of this query is mapped, values in the map are inserted
in this order , , ..., .
I'd like that map.keySet().iterator() let me iterate over values in that
Hi James!
can't we prepare the release in proper? Maybe it would be easier
attracting more people interested on contributing and get it ready for
a release quicker...
Best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http:
Can we get it ready for release first?
On Dec 18, 2011 3:13 PM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since I proposed[1] to resurrect commons-graph from dormant to
> sandbox, there's been not only my personal activity, but we have
> recorded a good number of discussions on the ML and received
> co
Hi all,
Since I proposed[1] to resurrect commons-graph from dormant to
sandbox, there's been not only my personal activity, but we have
recorded a good number of discussions on the ML and received
contributions on JIRA[2], involving not only PMC such as James but
also from users, such as Claudio Sq
On 18 December 2011 10:31, aris2world wrote:
> I've a question about CaseInsensitiveHashMap in BasicRowProcessor: it
> extends HashMap but if it will extend LinkedHashMap I think the resulting
> Map could seem more consistent with the executed query to a client
> perspective.
> I mean: when the me
Hi all
I've a question about CaseInsensitiveHashMap in BasicRowProcessor: it
extends HashMap but if it will extend LinkedHashMap I think the resulting
Map could seem more consistent with the executed query to a client
perspective.
I mean: when the method toMap puts the columns of the resultset int
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
21 matches
Mail list logo