Hello,
I have the dump on my local disk and was planning (again) to re-import
it incoming days, just give some time as right now I'm busy with
Struts 2 release ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>
> The release artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Maven distribution:
> http://people.
Hi all guys,The Digester 3.2 release passes with 4 +1 binding votes
from (in orded of received vote):
* Christian Grobmeier
* Simone Tripodi
* Gary Gregory
* Oliver Heger
no other votes have been casted.
I'll proceed with moving binaries, maven artifacts, closing issues,
deploying site.Thanks
First, thank you all again for the help!
I got past the GPG step, now I'm stuck on password/auth issues now with SVN :-(
I thought the issue was that my password manager wasn't authed and
that svn was working in a non-interactive mode, so it couldn't get my
password; this was the reason for -r121
Hola Claudio!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Claudio Squarcella
wrote:
> Hey Simone,
>
>
>
> trying to put it all together (thanks James, Matthew):
>
> * Weighted is fully generic without restrictions on the type of
> weight W
> * different properties of weights are specified with interface
On Dec 13, 2011, at 15:50, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 20:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
>>> I've added some Javadoc to classes to indicate which ones are supposed
>>> to be thread-safe and which are not.
>>>
>>> AFAICT, there remain 2 classes to be dealt with,
On 13 December 2011 20:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
>> I've added some Javadoc to classes to indicate which ones are supposed
>> to be thread-safe and which are not.
>>
>> AFAICT, there remain 2 classes to be dealt with, ie
>>
>> GenericKeyedObjectPool (GKOP)
>> and
>>
On 13/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
> I've added some Javadoc to classes to indicate which ones are supposed
> to be thread-safe and which are not.
>
> AFAICT, there remain 2 classes to be dealt with, ie
>
> GenericKeyedObjectPool (GKOP)
> and
> GenericObjectPool (GOP)
>
> GKOP is not currently thr
On 13 December 2011 19:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2011 18:40, s...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Tue Dec 13 18:40:48 2011
>> New Revision: 1213845
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213845&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make factories thread-safe.
>> [No existing tests actually
On 13/12/2011 18:40, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Tue Dec 13 18:40:48 2011
> New Revision: 1213845
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213845&view=rev
> Log:
> Make factories thread-safe.
> [No existing tests actually used the setter methods which have now been
> removed]
I've added some Javadoc to classes to indicate which ones are supposed
to be thread-safe and which are not.
AFAICT, there remain 2 classes to be dealt with, ie
GenericKeyedObjectPool (GKOP)
and
GenericObjectPool (GOP)
GKOP is not currently thread-safe, as there are several mutable
variables that
Hey Simone,
On 12/12/2011 18:35, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi James!
yes, actual Dijkstra implementation[1] uses Double number to
accumulating the total path weights...
I think Having an accumulator would be helpful! How do you would
modify the current implementation - even with pseudo-code?
tryin
Hi Mark,
please don't get me wrong, I did not want to underestimate your or infra
work (which on the contrary I really appreciate), I just answered to
Christian's question, which thought that: "... the OGNL stuff will go there
too?".
Unfortunately OGNL and XWork projects share the same dump, but h
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> Lots of applications depend on the 1.x branch as it is now.
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > What does it mean for an ap
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> @Christian
> I could be wrong, but AFAIU Looks like the infra team never imported
> the OGNL stuff, they declined
> Lukasz's request (http://s.apache.org/agN).
Actually it seems having OGNL on board is not straightforward. As I
understa
On 13/12/2011 15:54, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
> @Christian
> I could be wrong, but AFAIU Looks like the infra team never imported
> the OGNL stuff, they declined
> Lukasz's request (http://s.apache.org/agN).
I suggest you read all of that Jira. That isn't what happened at all. A
more accurate sum
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2011 14:25, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
> > away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
>
> I disagree in this case.
>
> A large proportion of the com
> @Simone> your city is little bit less competitive :)
after it was destroyed by the earthquake, it doesn't compete at all
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
--
@Christian
I could be wrong, but AFAIU Looks like the infra team never imported
the OGNL stuff, they declined
Lukasz's request (http://s.apache.org/agN).
@Simone
your city is little bit less competitive :)
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903
I'm pretty sure that the dump used for XWork contains also the OGNL
issues, though I don't think that it was imported as well.
I know that copying 26 issues is a very easy task, but we run the risk
to lost many precious infos (like date, author, also closed issues).
We should ask to the infra guys
> Hold your horses :)
LOL, in my city they say "hold the donkey" :D
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e
On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Lots of applications depend on the 1.x branch as it is now.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> What does it mean for an app to depend on a specific branch in SVN?
>
> Do those apps depend on 1.x SN
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 12:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Now it seems there once was a "test instance" with the importet set of
>> ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, but never got it. Now it
>> is offline:
>> https://issues.a
On 13 December 2011 12:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Now it seems there once was a "test instance" with the importet set of
> ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, but never got it. Now it
> is offline:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira-test/browse/XWASF
Hold your horses :), the URL your
On 13/12/2011 14:25, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
> away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
I disagree in this case.
A large proportion of the commons pool user base is from:
Apache Tomcat 5/6/7 -> Apache Commons
On 13 December 2011 15:19, William Speirs wrote:
> I will try adding the additional elements:
>
> /path/to/secring.gpg
>
> gpg2
Sorry, should have clarified - the above requires gpg2 to be installed
and created.
I installed both gpg1 and gpg2, and created gpg1 and gpg2 as copies of
their respec
I will try adding the additional elements:
/path/to/secring.gpg
gpg2
And also try with gpg2.
I'll try later today and update.
Thanks again for all of the help!
Bill-
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> FWIW: My set up is such that I always enter my password on the CLI whe
On 13 December 2011 14:50, Phil Steitz wrote:
> We have code close to ready for release that is fully genericised. Let's do
> that.
>
Exactly!
>
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> Frankly, I think that the la
On 13 December 2011 14:25, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
> away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
>
> I personally won't incorporate any non-genericized components if I can help
> it. There are a few exceptions wh
We have code close to ready for release that is fully genericised. Let's do
that.
On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
>> away more users than
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
> away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
>
> I personally won't incorporate any non-genericized components if I can help
> it. There are a few excepti
Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
I personally won't incorporate any non-genericized components if I can help
it. There are a few exceptions where I might like math libraries (oh wait,
commons-math a
FWIW: My set up is such that I always enter my password on the CLI when
Maven asks for it.
Gary
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 13:53, William Speirs wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >> Did you do the whole master pass phr
On 13 December 2011 13:53, William Speirs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Did you do the whole master pass phrase/obfuscated stuff that the top
>> of the Using Nexus wiki points to?
>
> I did not do this at first, but I have since tried. I setup my
> settings-sec
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Lots of applications depend on the 1.x branch as it is now.
Hello,
What does it mean for an app to depend on a specific branch in SVN?
Do those apps depend on 1.x SNAPSHOT releases? Do they download the code
and compile it? Which is where
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Did you do the whole master pass phrase/obfuscated stuff that the top
> of the Using Nexus wiki points to?
I did not do this at first, but I have since tried. I setup my
settings-security.xml file as show on the wiki page, and added the
encr
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Commons JEXL 2.1
Compatibility with previous releases
==
Version 2.1 is binary compatible with 2.0.1. However it is not source
compatible.
This is because new methods have been added to the following inte
Lots of applications depend on the 1.x branch as it is now. We really can't
just drop support. At least we shouldnt, IMO. What you are proposing is a
third release line. As I have stated before, we are having a hard time getting
timely bug fix releases out now with just *one* release line.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 11:36, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Generics would help to ensure suitable types were being used, but>
> would do nothing to prevent the subtle threading bugs that misusing a>
> protected field can cause.>> To my mind, it wo
>> But what is the point?> Do generics really make enough difference to be
>> worth spending the time on?>
we've had that feature available for more than one year[1] (see bottom
page, generics added on 11.10.2010 23:39:15) and not released yet,
when proposing the 2.0-beta1[2] the community reject
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 12:09, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello guys,
we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
ht
On 13 December 2011 12:09, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
>>>
>>> Now
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
>>
>> Now it seems there once was a "test instance" with the importet set
On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
>
> Now it seems there once was a "test instance" with the importet set of
> ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, bu
On 13 December 2011 11:36, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>> Generics would help to ensure suitable types were being used, but> would do
>> nothing to prevent the subtle threading bugs that misusing a> protected
>> field can cause.>> To my mind, it would paper over a few cracks, whilst
>> leaving gap
Hello guys,
we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
Now it seems there once was a "test instance" with the importet set of
ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, but never got it. Now it
is offline:
https://issues.apache.org/jira-t
>
> Generics would help to ensure suitable types were being used, but> would do
> nothing to prevent the subtle threading bugs that misusing a> protected field
> can cause.>> To my mind, it would paper over a few cracks, whilst leaving
> gaping> holes elsewhere.>
we just voted a new maintenance
On 13 December 2011 05:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 0:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> We keep on maintaining 1.5.x, that is very good :)
>>>
>>> But, I for one, am tired of not having generics and do
that would be definitively helpful! - not just for this task!
thanks Christian for sharing!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 13 December 2011 04:56, William Speirs wrote:
> I was able to get past the hanging issue, but I'm not in a better
> place. I've added my passphrase to my settings.xml file (which I hate
> to do), but it reports now that my passphrase is bad. Enabling
> debugging I see:
>
> INFO] [DEBUG] Configu
Excellent stuff! Love it to have a chinese translation on hand!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Then: our actual documentation format is xdoc for maven site - that
> support locales[2] (see Internationalization) - so if you could be so
> kind to checkout the actual OGNL
Ni hao Li,
there's no rush, don't worry :) Many thanks in advance!
zai jian,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Li Ying wrote:
> Thanks for your informati
Thanks for your information.
I will do it when I get time, maybe tomorrow, or a few days later.
2011/12/13 Simone Tripodi :
> Ni-hao Li,I personally think your contribution is a wonderful one: as
> Maurizio told you, please sign the ICLA[1] and send a scanned copy to
> secret...@apache.org
>
>
Ni-hao Li,I personally think your contribution is a wonderful one: as
Maurizio told you, please sign the ICLA[1] and send a scanned copy to
secret...@apache.org
Then: our actual documentation format is xdoc for maven site - that
support locales[2] (see Internationalization) - so if you could be so
Hi Gary!
that's something similar I proposed time ago[1] - exactly May 5th -
for the same need of having Generics, but I didn't have succes :)
Since we are in do-ocracy if you intend to work on it you have my full
support - I already applied Generics twice on Pool, I can do it for
the third - in t
forgot to mention you have to activate that profile during the release, I mean
mvn release:prepare -P rc,apache
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:14
Hi William,
In my apache profile, in `setting.xml` file I put the
element in order to execute maven, during the
release phase, in a proper fork:
apache
false
scp
forked-path
Hi Li,
thank for your contribute. I'm pretty sure you have to sign a CLA (in
case you haven't already done).
IMO the best way to expose your docs could be under wiki, but I don't
know if OGNL has one.
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/10790371154
61 matches
Mail list logo
