Re: [VOTE] Release JEXL 2.1 based on RC1

Cancelled vote. Henrib -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-JEXL-2-1-based-on-RC1-tp4113403p4114453.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To un

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release JEXL 2.1 based on RC1

Gary and Sebb pointed out that, per apache release rules, incompatible binaries require new package name (i.e. jexl3). My bad, sorry. Henrib - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

Hi Emmanuel, Le 28/11/2011 07:12, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > I like the skin. Does it also provide syntax highlighting for Java > snippets ? > > I haven't tested the skin on a wide screen, does it expand on the whole > width or is there a maximum width? The readability is usually considered > bet

[math] KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution not part of the distribution hierarchy

Hi, while working on MATH-711, I noticed that the above-mentioned distribution does not implement any of the interfaces provided. Is there a reason for us providing only the cdf? If yes, shouldn't this method be renamed {{cumulativeProbability}}, in order to be consistent with other implementations

[math] Inconsistencies (bugs) in PascalDistribution?

Hello, while working on MATH-711, I think I stumbled upon some inconsistencies in the implementation of the Pascal distribution. In fact, these might well be a bug, but since I'm a bit rusty on probabilities, I would be grateful for some feedback. Here is the thing. The header of the Javadoc states

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

Simo, I love the new skin. I would love to see this instead of the old stuff for commons. Who really is attracted by a site design like that we have now (in times of designed computers, iphones etc)? It seems to me many youngster contribute to the projects with the best looking sites, not to the p

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

I like the skin. Does it also provide syntax highlighting for Java snippets ? I haven't tested the skin on a wide screen, does it expand on the whole width or is there a maximum width? The readability is usually considered better when the lines of text aren't too long. A new skin could be th

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [digester] help on fixing DIGESTER-153

Sorry, I missed this. I've done something like this before. Ping me in a few days. :) Matt On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi James! > many thanks in advance!!! All the best, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release JEXL 2.1 based on RC1

On 28 November 2011 01:03, Gary Gregory wrote: > I see 35 Clirr Errors that point to backwards incompatibility. Many of these relate to the parser, which is not really part of the public API. However, there are some which do look like they break binary compatibility > So... do we have a Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release JEXL 2.1 based on RC1

I see 35 Clirr Errors that point to backwards incompatibility. So... do we have a Commons-wide policy of changing package names and making a major release (3.0 vs. 2.1 here) or not? Gary On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Henri Biestro wrote: > > Dear all, > > After a pretty long cycle, JEXL 2.1

Re: [Validator] won't be continued ?

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Erhan Bagdemir wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > I think that it's a project which seems to be discontinued. > The last reply on Jira is from August. > Maybe they do need some contribution support from newcomers :-) I assure you, the Bean Validation podling is not

[VOTE] Release JEXL 2.1 based on RC1

Dear all, After a pretty long cycle, JEXL 2.1 is ready for review. Here is a quick list of new features (from the release notes): What's new in 2.1: == * A more thorough arithmetic (JexlArithmetic) that allows fine control over decimals (scale and precision), a new syntax for

Re: [Validator] won't be continued ?

Thanks for your reply. I think that it's a project which seems to be discontinued. The last reply on Jira is from August. Maybe they do need some contribution support from newcomers :-) Am 27.11.2011 um 19:39 schrieb Simone Tripodi: > Hi Erhan, > for JSR303 I suggest you adopting Apache BeanVa

Re: [chain][v2] chain-58

Hi Everyone, After a bunch of work, I was able to genericize chain into using contexts with the signature Context as per Paul's suggestion. It took sweeping code changes to the chain codebase. Please see the patch attached to the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-58 The primary a

Re: [Validator] won't be continued ?

Hi Erhan, for JSR303 I suggest you adopting Apache BeanValidation[1]. HTH! Simo [1] http://incubator.apache.org/bval/cwiki/index.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7

[Validator] won't be continued ?

Is there any plan or improvement for Validator project? I see on Jira that the second version was already planed some time ago and includes JSR303 in which i'm very interested. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons

Re: [math] constrained optimization

Hello, Le 14/11/2011 16:34, luc.maison...@free.fr a écrit : > Hi Gilles, > > - Mail original - >> Hi. >> [...] > > In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be > set at > the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa, > Ne

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

On Nov 27, 2011, at 11:42, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Do we have a Maven Jira? > > I assume you are asking if anyone has opened an issue in Maven's Jira? > >> >> Any interest in a short burst of [commons] energy from this ML to >> address these k

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

On Nov 27, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Do we have a Maven Jira? I assume you are asking if anyone has opened an issue in Maven's Jira? > > Any interest in a short burst of [commons] energy from this ML to > address these kinds of issues with [maven]? Site generation comes up > ov

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

On Nov 27, 2011, at 7:19, sebb wrote: > On 27 November 2011 11:40, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> While the l'n'f can be easily changed - it is just a matter of assign >> styles - not all strict commons customizations are not included in the >> skin, since it is a general skin with the purpose to serv

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

On 27 November 2011 11:40, Simone Tripodi wrote: > While the l'n'f can be easily changed - it is just a matter of assign > styles - not all strict commons customizations are not included in the > skin, since it is a general skin with the purpose to serve not only > commons. The changes I did for

Re: [discuss] adopt a new skin for commons sites

While the l'n'f can be easily changed - it is just a matter of assign styles - not all strict commons customizations are not included in the skin, since it is a general skin with the purpose to serve not only commons. I don't see other solution ATM than forking the skin if we intend to apply it, b

Re: [math] release plan for 3.0 ?

2011/11/26 Phil Steitz : > On 11/23/11 11:28 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> Hello, >> >>   * MATH-699 (inverseCumulativeDistribution fails with cumulative >> distribution having a plateau): I have posted a new implementation of >> inverseCumulativeDistribution which does "not really" solve this >>