Hi,
here are a few questions about the implicit rules in use in CM for
formatting Javadoc comments, that I've wanted to post for a long time.
Since I'm now reviewing other people's patches, I think it's high time
to clear these questions up. If I'm not mistaken,
(1) every @param tag should start wi
Dear all,
Christian has done a great work at splitting up the distribution
hierarchy. His patch is in good shape and could be committed soon, but
for a few questions I've raised. I would very much like to have the
point of view of more expert people on these, so if you get the
chance, could you ple
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
> Scratching my head a bit to see where on the GitHub site you find the
> link to the .patch file; I hunted for that and ended up using c+p
> (hadn't seen this email).
Of course you could have cloned the contributors repo - it has the
modifications. You could have done a diff locally. Lots of down
On 11/24/2011 08:12 PM, sebb wrote:
+
+We assume, that you checked out
+https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/trunk
Would it not be better to tag first and then check out the tag?
Sure that is one of the options.
Anyhow here I try to explain (work-in-progress) what
has to b
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 06:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>> I care more about the fact that the native binaries are available than
>> how they are packaged. Separately (32-bit, ia64, amd64) or all in one. I
>> prefer all i
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Applied.
>
> Scratching my head a bit to see where on the GitHub site you find the
> link to the .patch file; I hunted for that and ended up using c+p
> (hadn't seen this email).
>
> Good to see that we're getting notified when a pull request
Applied.
Scratching my head a bit to see where on the GitHub site you find the
link to the .patch file; I hunted for that and ended up using c+p
(hadn't seen this email).
Good to see that we're getting notified when a pull request comes in :)
Hen
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Henning Schmied
Le 24/11/2011 10:40, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
>
>>
>> Issues that I have reported are
>> * MATH-581 (Support for iterative linear solvers): there is now a
>> framework for this feature, as well as two solvers (conjugate
>> gradient, SYMMLQ). While this might be extended with other solvers
Le 23/11/2011 23:10, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> [...]
>>
>>>
could other people add to this list the features they want to have in 3.0 ?
>>>
>>> I think that more important is the review of opened tickets, asking for
>>> people to commit working on them... [Oops, sorry again.]
>>
>> Yes, thi
On 24 November 2011 18:51, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Thu Nov 24 18:51:30 2011
> New Revision: 1205957
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205957&view=rev
> Log:
> Some initail 2.0 tasks. Start cleaning up old docs. Add HOWTO-RELEASE
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/daemon/trunk/HOWTO-RE
On 11/24/2011 07:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I think commons stuff no longer carry the Jakarta prefix. It's Apache
Commons now. Not Apache Jakatra Commons.
Sure, that's old stuff I moved from branches to tags so it doesn't
pollute the branches dir. Its purely for archive purposes.
There are wh
I think commons stuff no longer carry the Jakarta prefix. It's Apache
Commons now. Not Apache Jakatra Commons.
Gary
On Nov 24, 2011, at 13:29, "mt...@apache.org" wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Thu Nov 24 18:29:29 2011
> New Revision: 1205951
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205951&vie
On 11/24/2011 06:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM, sebb wrote:
I care more about the fact that the native binaries are available than how
they are packaged. Separately (32-bit, ia64, amd64) or all in one. I prefer
all in one.
They are packed as all-in-one (manuall
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 15:36, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 24 November 2011 12:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> How do I get the Windows EXEs out of Maven Central?
> >>
> >> You don't; Maven Central is for Java dependencies only.
>
sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 15:36, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 November 2011 12:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
How do I get the Windows EXEs out of Maven Central?
>>>
>>> You don't; Maven Central is for Java dependencies only.
>>
>> Who said that? The repo contains wha
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 06:21, wrote:
>> Author: bayard
>> Date: Thu Nov 24 06:20:59 2011
>> New Revision: 1205734
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205734&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Adding Henning's GitHub pull request with a Triple implementation.
On 24 November 2011 15:36, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 24 November 2011 12:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> How do I get the Windows EXEs out of Maven Central?
>>
>> You don't; Maven Central is for Java dependencies only.
>
> Who said that? The repo contains whatever has been uploaded/d
sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 12:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> How do I get the Windows EXEs out of Maven Central?
>
> You don't; Maven Central is for Java dependencies only.
Who said that? The repo contains whatever has been uploaded/deployed.
- Jörg
---
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 12:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > How do I get the Windows EXEs out of Maven Central?
>
> You don't; Maven Central is for Java dependencies only.
>
Well, that's not putting me in the holiday spirit.
It is a Java dependency in the
I have been traveling the last couple of days. Will respond tomorrow or
Saturday.
Phil
On Nov 23, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have had several questions about release plans for 3.0.
>
> I feel guilty for not having pushed this version out yet. It is not in
> rele
Congraatulations!
;)
Gary
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Apache Commons Daemon team is pleased to announce the
> commons-daemon-1.0.8 release!
> Version 1.0.8 is both a bug fix and feature update release.
>
> Source and binary distributions are available for download
>
On 24 November 2011 06:21, wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Thu Nov 24 06:20:59 2011
> New Revision: 1205734
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205734&view=rev
> Log:
> Adding Henning's GitHub pull request with a Triple implementation. LANG-675
>
> Added:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/
Hi.
>
> Issues that I have reported are
> * MATH-581 (Support for iterative linear solvers): there is now a
> framework for this feature, as well as two solvers (conjugate
> gradient, SYMMLQ). While this might be extended with other solvers as
> well, it could certainly wait (and would not lead
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/hgschmie/commons-lang trunk
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/1
-- Commit Summary --
* Add a Triple tuple class analog to the Pair.
-- File Changes --
25 matches
Mail list logo
